Light cone and Weyl compatibility of conformal and projective structures
Vladimir S. Matveev, Erhard Scholz
Abstract
Abstract In the literature different concepts of compatibility between a projective structure $${\mathscr {P}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:math> and a conformal structure $${\mathscr {C}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> </mml:math> on a differentiable manifold are used. In particular compatibility in the sense of Weyl geometry is slightly more general than compatibility in the Riemannian sense. In an often cited paper (Ehlers et al. in: O’Raifertaigh (ed) General Relativity, Papers in Honour of J.L. Synge, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2012) Ehlers/Pirani/Schild introduce still another criterion which is natural from the physical point of view: every light like geodesics of $${\mathscr {C}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> </mml:math> is a geodesics of $${\mathscr {P}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:math> . Their claim that this type of compatibility is sufficient for introducing a Weylian metric has recently been questioned (Trautman in Gen Relativ Gravit 44:1581–1586, 2012); (Vladimir in Commun Math Phys 329:821–825, 2014); as reported by Scholz (in: A scalar field inducing a non-metrical contribution to gravitational acceleration and a compatible add-on to light deflection, 2019). Here it is proved that the conjecture of EPS is correct.