Litcius/Paper detail

Measuring Disentanglement: A Review of Metrics

Marc‐André Carbonneau, Julian Zaïdi, Jonathan Boilard, Ghyslain Gagnon

2022IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems46 citationsDOI

Abstract

Learning to disentangle and represent factors of variation in data is an important problem in artificial intelligence. While many advances have been made to learn these representations, it is still unclear how to quantify disentanglement. While several metrics exist, little is known on their implicit assumptions, what they truly measure, and their limits. In consequence, it is difficult to interpret results when comparing different representations. In this work, we survey supervised disentanglement metrics and thoroughly analyze them. We propose a new taxonomy in which all metrics fall into one of the three families: intervention-based, predictor-based, and information-based. We conduct extensive experiments in which we isolate properties of disentangled representations, allowing stratified comparison along several axes. From our experiment results and analysis, we provide insights on relations between disentangled representation properties. Finally, we share guidelines on how to measure disentanglement.

Topics & Concepts

Computer scienceMeasure (data warehouse)Representation (politics)Variation (astronomy)Artificial intelligenceTaxonomy (biology)Machine learningData scienceData miningPolitical scienceLawAstrophysicsPoliticsBiologyPhysicsBotanyAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningDigital Media Forensic Detection
Measuring Disentanglement: A Review of Metrics | Litcius