Litcius/Paper detail

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Enhances Gastrointestinal Recovery after Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marcell Virág, Máté Rottler, Noémi Gede, Klementina Ocskay, Tamás Leiner, Máté Tuba, Szabolcs Ábrahám, Nelli Farkas, Péter Hegyi, Zsolt Molnár

2022Journal of Personalized Medicine15 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

(1) Background: Whether goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) provides any outcome benefit as compared to non-goal-directed fluid therapy (N-GDFT) in elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery has not been determined yet. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The main outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOHS), time to first flatus and stool, intraoperative fluid and vasopressor requirements, serum lactate levels, and urinary output. Pooled risks ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. (3) Results: Eleven studies were included in the quantitative, and fifteen in the qualitative synthesis. LOHS (WMD: −1.18 days, 95% CI: −1.84 to −0.53) and time to first stool (WMD: −9.8 h; CI −12.7 to −7.0) were significantly shorter in the GDFT group. GDFT resulted in significantly less intraoperative fluid administration (WMD: −441 mL, 95% CI: −790 to −92) and lower lactate levels at the end of the operation: WMD: −0.25 mmol L−1; 95% CI: −0.36 to −0.14. (4) Conclusions: GDFT resulted in enhanced recovery of the gastrointestinal function and shorter LOHS as compared to N-GDFT.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMeta-analysisConfidence intervalGastrointestinal functionSurgeryLaparoscopyAbdominal surgeryAnesthesiaInternal medicineHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesAbdominal Surgery and Complications