Litcius/Paper detail

Does AI Qualify for the Job?

Fernando Martínez‐Plumed, Songül Tolan, Annarosa Pesole, José Hernández‐Orallo, Enrique Fernández‐Macías, Emília Gómez

2020Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society73 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In this paper we present a setting for examining the relation be-tween the distribution of research intensity in AI research and the relevance for a range of work tasks (and occupations) in current and simulated scenarios. We perform a mapping between labourand AI using a set of cognitive abilities as an intermediate layer. This setting favours a two-way interpretation to analyse (1) what impact current or simulated AI research activity has or would have on labour-related tasks and occupations, and (2) what areas of AI research activity would be responsible for a desired or undesired effect on specific labour tasks and occupations. Concretely, in our analysis we map 59 generic labour-related tasks from several worker surveys and databases to 14 cognitive abilities from the cognitive science literature, and these to a comprehensive list of 328 AI benchmarks used to evaluate progress in AI techniques. We provide this model and its implementation as a tool for simulations. We also show the effectiveness of our setting with some illustrative examples.

Topics & Concepts

Relevance (law)Computer scienceCognitionRelation (database)Set (abstract data type)Interpretation (philosophy)Range (aeronautics)Artificial intelligenceWork (physics)Data scienceMachine learningPsychologyData miningEngineeringNeuroscienceAerospace engineeringProgramming languageMechanical engineeringPolitical scienceLawReinforcement Learning in RoboticsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Cognitive Science and Mapping
Does AI Qualify for the Job? | Litcius