Litcius/Paper detail

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Analysis Populations in the RESTORE-IMI 1 Phase 3 Trial of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam versus Colistin plus Imipenem-Cilastatin in Patients with Imipenem-Nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections

Keith S. Kaye, Helen W. Boucher, Michelle Brown, Angela Aggrey, Ireen Khan, Hee‐Koung Joeng, Robert Tipping, Jiejun Du, Katherine Young, Joan R. Butterton, Amanda Paschke

2020Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

= 31) populations had similar baseline characteristics, including sex, age, illness severity, and renal function. In both analysis populations, favorable overall response rates in the IMI-REL treatment group were >70%. Favorable clinical response rates at day 28 were 71.4% for IMI-REL and 40.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 75.0% for IMI-REL and 53.8% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. Day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 9.5% for IMI-REL and 30.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 10.7% for IMI-REL and 23.1% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. The outcomes in the SmMITT population were generally consistent with those in the mMITT population, suggesting that outcomes may be applicable to the real-world use of IMI-REL for treating infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02452047.).

Topics & Concepts

Imipenem/cilastatinImipenemColistinCilastatinMedicineInternal medicineCarbapenemAntibacterial agentAntibioticsMicrobiologyBiologyAntibiotic resistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyPneumonia and Respiratory Infections