Video vs direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing endotracheal intubation
Steve Bell, Elspeth Pennington, J. Hill
Abstract
The safety and utility of endotracheal intubation by paramedics in the UK is a matter of debate. Considering the controversy surrounding the safety of paramedic-performed endotracheal intubation, any interventions that enhance patient safety should be evaluated for implementation based on solid evidence of their effectiveness. A systematic review performed by Hansel and colleagues (2022) sought to assess and compare video laryngoscopes against direct laryngoscopes in clinical practice. This commentary aims to critically appraise the methods used within the review by Hansel et al (2022) and expand upon the findings in the context of clinical practice.
Topics & Concepts
MedicineEmergency Care PractitionerLaryngoscopesCombat Medical TechnicianEndotracheal intubationLaryngoscopyIntubationContext (archaeology)Major traumaUnconsciousnessIntensive care medicinePsychological interventionContinuing professional developmentAnesthesiaMedical emergencyNursingPaleontologyBiologyMedical educationProfessional developmentAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationEmergency and Acute Care Studies