Litcius/Paper detail

Chat-IRB? How application-specific language models can enhance research ethics review

Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Jiehao Joel Seah, Stephen R. Latham, Julian Savulescu, Mateo Aboy, Brian D. Earp

2025Journal of Medical Ethics6 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Institutional review boards (IRBs) play a crucial role in ensuring the ethical conduct of human subjects research, but face challenges including inconsistency, delays, and inefficiencies. We propose the development and implementation of application-specific large language models (LLMs) to facilitate IRB review processes. These IRB-specific LLMs would be fine-tuned on IRB-specific literature and institutional datasets, and equipped with retrieval capabilities to access up-to-date, context-relevant information. We outline potential applications, including pre-review screening, preliminary analysis, consistency checking, and decision support. While addressing concerns about accuracy, context sensitivity, and human oversight, we acknowledge remaining challenges such as over-reliance on artificial intelligence and the need for transparency. By enhancing the efficiency and quality of ethical review while maintaining human judgement in critical decisions, IRB-specific LLMs offer a promising tool to improve research oversight. We call for pilot studies to evaluate the feasibility and impact of this approach.

Topics & Concepts

Transparency (behavior)Context (archaeology)Consistency (knowledge bases)Computer scienceEngineering ethicsResearch ethicsData scienceComputer securityArtificial intelligenceEngineeringBiologyPaleontologyEthics in Clinical ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AI
Chat-IRB? How application-specific language models can enhance research ethics review | Litcius