Litcius/Paper detail

Partial in vivo reprogramming enables injury-free intestinal regeneration via autonomous <i>Ptgs1</i> induction

Jumee Kim, Somi Kim, Seungyeon Lee, Beom‐Ki Jo, J. Y. Oh, Eun‐Ji Kwon, Keun-Tae Kim, Anish Ashok Adpaikar, Eun‐Jung Kim, Han‐Sung Jung, Hwa-Ryeon Kim, Jae‐Seok Roe, Chang Pyo Hong, Jong Kim, Bon‐Kyoung Koo, Hyuk‐Jin Cha

2023Science Advances31 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Tissue regeneration after injury involves the dedifferentiation of somatic cells, a natural adaptive reprogramming that leads to the emergence of injury-responsive cells with fetal-like characteristics. However, there is no direct evidence that adaptive reprogramming involves a shared molecular mechanism with direct cellular reprogramming. Here, we induced dedifferentiation of intestinal epithelial cells using OSKM (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc) in vivo. The OSKM-induced forced dedifferentiation showed similar molecular features of intestinal regeneration, including a transition from homeostatic cell types to injury-responsive–like cell types. These injury-responsive–like cells, sharing gene signatures of revival stem cells and atrophy-induced villus epithelial cells, actively assisted tissue regeneration following damage. In contrast to normal intestinal regeneration involving Ptgs2 induction, the OSKM promotes autonomous production of prostaglandin E2 via epithelial Ptgs1 expression. These results indicate prostaglandin synthesis is a common mechanism for intestinal regeneration but involves a different enzyme when partial reprogramming is applied to the intestinal epithelium.

Topics & Concepts

ReprogrammingKLF4Cell biologyBiologyRegeneration (biology)SOX2Stem cellIn vivoCellEmbryonic stem cellBiochemistryGeneticsGeneTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicinePluripotent Stem Cells ResearchLiver physiology and pathology