Litcius/Paper detail

Tuning of Microenvironment in Covalent Organic Framework <i>via</i> Fluorination Strategy promotes Selective CO<sub>2</sub> Capture

Nitumani Das, Ratul Paul, Rupak Chatterjee, Digambar Balaji Shinde, Zhiping Lai, Asim Bhaumik, John Mondal

2022Chemistry - An Asian Journal39 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract Herein, we have designed and synthesized two heteroatom (N, O) rich covalent organic frameworks (COF), PD‐COF and TF‐COF , respectively, to demonstrate their relative effect on CO 2 adsorption capacity and also CO 2 /N 2 selectivity. Compared to the non‐fluorinated PD‐COF (BET surface area 805 m 2 g −1 , total pore volume 0.3647 ccg −1 ), a decrease in BET surface area and also pore volume have been observed for fluorinated TF‐COF due to the incorporation of fluorine to the porous framework (BET surface area 451 m 2 g −1 , total pore volume 0.2978 ccg −1 ). This fact leads to an enormous decrease in the CO 2 adsorption capacity and CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of TF‐COF , though it shows stronger affinity towards CO 2 with a Qst of 37.76 KJ/mol. The more CO 2 adsorption capacity by PD‐COF can be attributed to the large specific surface area with considerable amount of micropore volume compared to the TF‐COF . Further, PD‐COF exhibited CO 2 /N 2 selectivity of 16.8, higher than that of TF‐COF (CO 2 /N 2 selectivity 13.4).

Topics & Concepts

SelectivityCovalent organic frameworkHeteroatomAdsorptionBET theoryMicroporous materialChemistryCovalent bondVolume (thermodynamics)Specific surface areaAccessible surface areaChemical engineeringPorosityOrganic chemistryComputational chemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsRing (chemistry)CatalysisEngineeringCovalent Organic Framework ApplicationsMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Tuning of Microenvironment in Covalent Organic Framework <i>via</i> Fluorination Strategy promotes Selective CO<sub>2</sub> Capture | Litcius