Litcius/Paper detail

Impact of obesity on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Patient characteristics, procedural complications, outcomes, and quality of life

Chadi Tabaja, Arwa Younis, Pasquale Santageli, Medhat Farwati, Lorenzo Braghieri, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Walid I. Saliba, Ruth A. Madden, Patricia Bouscher, Mohamed Kanj, Thomas Callahan, David Martín, Mandeep Bhargava, Mina K. Chung, Bryan Baranowski, Shady Nakhla, Jakub Sroubek, Justin Lee, Tyler L. Taigen, Oussama M. Wazni, Ayman A. Hussein

2023Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a well-known risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). We aim to evaluate the effect of baseline obesity on procedural complications, AF recurrence, and symptoms following catheter ablation (CA). METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2021) at our center were enrolled in a prospective registry. The study included all consecutive patients with available data on body mass index (BMI). Primary endpoint was AF recurrence based on electrocardiographic documentation. Patients were categorized into five groups according to their baseline BMI. Patients survey at baseline and at follow-up were used to calculate AF symptom severity score (AFSS) as well as AF burden (mean of AF duration score and AF frequency score; scale 0: no AF to 10: continuous and 9 frequencies/durations in between). Patients were scheduled for follow-up visits with 12-lead electrocardiogram at 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation, and every 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: A total of 5841 patients were included (17% normal weight, 34% overweight, 27% Class I, 13% Class II, and 9% Class III obesity). Major procedural complications were low (1.5%) among all BMI subgroups. At 3 years AF recurrence was the highest in Class III obesity patients (48%) followed by Class II (43%), whereas Class I, normal, and overweight had similar results with lower recurrence (35%). In multivariable analyses, Class III obesity (BMI ≥ 40) was independently associated with increased risk for AF recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.30; confidence interval, 1.06-1.60; p = .01), whereas other groups had similar risk in comparison to normal weight. Baseline AFSS was lowest in normal weight, and highest in Obesity-III, median (interquartile range) 10 (5-16) versus 15 (10-21). In all groups, CA resulted in a significant improvement in their AFSS with a similar magnitude among the groups. At follow-up, AF burden was minimal and did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: AF ablation is safe with a low complication rate across all BMI groups. Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) was significantly associated with reduced AF ablation success. However, ablation resulted in improvement in QoL including reduction of the AFSS, and AF burden regardless of BMI.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineAtrial fibrillationOverweightBody mass indexHazard ratioInternal medicineConfidence intervalCatheter ablationObesityCardiologyClinical endpointProspective cohort studySurgeryRandomized controlled trialAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments