Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion: Real-world Experience and Outcomes of DCD Liver Transplantation
Yanik J. Bababekov, Anna H. Ha, Trevor L. Nydam, Carlos Gonçalves, Rashikh A. Choudhury, JoLynn Shinsako, Maria Baimas‐George, David M. Reynolds, Cassidy Yoshida, Caroline A. Racke, Han Grewal, Sophia Pomposelli, Iván E. Rodrı́guez, Jordan Hoffman, Jesse D. Schold, Bruce Kaplan, Elizabeth A. Pomfret, James J. Pomposelli
Abstract
Background. Donation after circulatory death liver transplantation (DCD LT) is underused given historical outcomes fraught with ischemic cholangiopathy (IC). We aimed to assess 6-mo IC in LT from DCD via normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) compared with DCD via static cold storage (SCS). Methods. A retrospective review of adult Maastricht-III DCD liver donors and recipients at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 1, 2017, to August 27, 2024, was performed. The 6-mo IC rate was compared between NRP and SCS. Secondary outcomes included biochemical assessments of accepted versus declined NRP liver allografts and allograft and patient survival for NRP and SCS groups. Results. One hundred sixty-two DCD LTs (SCS = 79; NRP = 97) were performed and 150 recipients (SCS = 74; NRP = 86) reached 6-mo follow-up. Six-month IC was lower for NRP compared with SCS (1.2% versus 9.5%, P = 0.03). The Donor Risk Index (2.44 [2.02–2.82] versus 2.17 [1.97–2.30], P = 0.002) and UK DCD Risk Score (4.2 ± 2.9 versus 3.2 ± 2.3, P = 0.008) were higher for NRP versus SCS. The Liver Graft assessment Following Transplantation score was less for NRP compared with SCS (–3.3 versus –3.1, P < 0.05). There were several differences in median biochemical parameters during NRP between accepted and declined livers, including higher terminal biliary bicarbonate (22.7 [20.9–29.1] versus 10.8 [7.6–13.1] mEq/L, P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in 12-mo allograft or patient survival for NRP versus SCS. Conclusions. NRP is a disruptive innovation that improves the utilization of DCD livers. Despite higher-risk donor-recipient pairing for NRP compared with SCS, we demonstrate a decrease in IC for NRP. These data facilitate benchmarking of thoracoabdominal NRP DCD LT and support further protocol development.