Proactive Uplink Interference Management for Nonuniform Heterogeneous Cellular Networks
Muhammad Sajid Haroon, Fazal Muhammad, Ziaul Haq Abbas, Ghulam Abbas, Nisar Ahmed, Sunghwan Kim
Abstract
In homogeneous cellular networks, fractional power control (FPC) is employed to partially compensate the path-loss and, hence, improve uplink (U <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L</sub> ) signal-to-interference ratio (SIR). However, this scheme is less effective in heterogeneous cellular networks (HetNets) because: (i) except the typical user, all other users with variable U <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L</sub> transmit power (UTP) act as interferers, (ii) FPC leads to high UTP by edge users and, hence, more interference, and (iii) small base stations (SBSs)' densification further increases network interferences. Leveraging FPC in HetNets, we propose nonuniform SBS deployment (NU-SBS <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D</sub> ) to reduce interference and, thus, increase network performance. According to our NU-SBS model, SBS deployment (SBS ) near macro base station (MBS) is avoided, whereas MBS coverage edge area is enriched with ultra-dense SBS <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D</sub> . NU-SBS model leads to: (i) better SIR reception of MBS coverage edge users, (ii) fewer SBS requirement, and (iii) better SBS coverage in the MBS coverage edge area. Moreover, to make a model more proactive, we also consider reverse frequency allocation (RFA) to further abate both U <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L</sub> and downlink (D <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">L</sub> ) interferences. The coverage probability expressions are derived for both uniform SBS deployment (U-SBS <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D</sub> ) and NU-SBS while using RFA and FPC. Through simulation and numerical results, we characterize coverage probability for different values of SIR threshold, path loss compensation factor, SBS density, users density, and the distance between the typical user and the associated base station. The proposed NU-SBS model along with RFA leads to reduced network interference as compared with U-SBS and, thus, leverages FPC in HetNets.