Litcius/Paper detail

Evolution of the Size–Mass Relation of Star-forming Galaxies Since z = 5.5 Revealed by CEERS

Ethan M. Ward, Alexander de la Vega, Bahram Mobasher, Elizabeth J. McGrath, Kartheik G. Iyer, Antonello Calabrò, Luca Costantin, Mark Dickinson, Benne W. Holwerda, Michaela Hirschmann, Ray A. Lucas, Viraj Pandya, Stephen M. Wilkins, L. Y. Aaron Yung, Pablo Arrabal Haro, Micaela B. Bagley, Steven L. Finkelstein, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, Anton M. Koekemoer, Casey Papovich, Nor Pirzkal

2024The Astrophysical Journal65 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract We combine deep imaging data from the CEERS early release JWST survey and Hubble Space Telescope imaging from CANDELS to examine the size–mass relation of star-forming galaxies and the morphology–quenching relation at stellar masses M ⋆ ≥ 10 9.5 M ⊙ over the redshift range 0.5 < z < 5.5. In this study with a sample of 2450 galaxies, we separate star-forming and quiescent galaxies based on their star formation activity and confirm that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have different morphologies out to z = 5.5, extending the results of earlier studies out to higher redshifts. We find that star-forming and quiescent galaxies have typical Sérsic indices of n ∼ 1.3 and n ∼ 4.3, respectively. Focusing on star-forming galaxies, we find that the slope of the size–mass relation is nearly constant with redshift, as was found previously, but shows a modest increase at z ∼ 4.2. The intercept in the size–mass relation declines out to z = 5.5 at rates that are similar to what earlier studies found. The intrinsic scatter in the size–mass relation is relatively constant out to z = 5.5.

Topics & Concepts

PhysicsAstrophysicsStellar massRedshiftGalaxyAstronomyStar formationLuminous infrared galaxyElliptical galaxyStar (game theory)Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGamma-ray bursts and supernovae