Litcius/Paper detail

<i>Whose Touch is This?</i> : Understanding the Agency Trade-Off Between User-Driven Touch vs. Computer-Driven Touch

Daisuke Tajima, Jun Nishida, Pedro Lopes, Shunichi Kasahara

2022ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction33 citationsDOI

Abstract

Force-feedback enhances digital touch by enabling users to share non-verbal aspects such as rhythm, poses, and so on. To achieve this, interfaces actuate the user’s to touch involuntarily (using exoskeletons or electrical-muscle-stimulation); we refer to this as computer-driven touch. Unfortunately, forcing users to touch causes a loss of their sense of agency. While researchers found that delaying the timing of computer-driven touch preserves agency, they only considered the naïve case when user-driven touch is aligned with computer-driven touch. We argue this is unlikely as it assumes we can perfectly predict user-touches. But, what about all the remainder situations: when the haptics forces the user into an outcome they did not intend or assists the user in an outcome they would not achieve alone? We unveil, via an experiment, what happens in these novel situations. From our findings, we synthesize a framework that enables researchers of digital-touch systems to trade-off between haptic-assistance vs. sense-of-agency.

Topics & Concepts

Haptic technologyAgency (philosophy)Human–computer interactionComputer scienceSense of agencyForcing (mathematics)Outcome (game theory)Multi-touchInternet privacySimulationPsychologySocial psychologyGeologyPhilosophyMathematicsMathematical economicsEpistemologyClimatologyFree Will and AgencyVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
<i>Whose Touch is This?</i> : Understanding the Agency Trade-Off Between User-Driven Touch vs. Computer-Driven Touch | Litcius