Brayton pumped thermal energy storage: Optimal dispatchment in multi-energy districts
Alessandra Ghilardi, Guido Francesco Frate, Konstantinos Kyprianidis, Mauro Tucci, Lorenzo Ferrari
Abstract
• Brayton Pumped Thermal Energy Storage integrated in urban energy district. • Deep-decarbonization scenarios by integrating PV production. • Mixed Integer Linear programming for day-ahead optimal scheduling. • Multi-energy mode reduces operational costs up to 10 % compared to the electric one. • Multi-energy mode brings to 3–10 % unavoidable thermal curtailment losses. Energy storage systems play a crucial role in supporting the integration of renewable energy sources. In this framework, Brayton Pumped Thermal Energy Storage is an emerging technology thanks to many positive features, including geographical and raw materials independence, long lifetime, and peculiar sector-coupling capabilities. By storing electric energy as thermal exergy, this technology offers the flexibility to discharge energy directly for heating or cooling applications or convert it back into electricity as needed by the grid. This dual functionality fits well with the multi-energy intrinsic nature of urban districts in which electrical and thermal energy carriers are involved. This paper aims then to evaluate the potential economic benefit due to the usage of a Brayton based Pumped Thermal Energy Storage as multi-energy device instead of a solely electric-to-electric. An urban district with thermal and electric requirements is used as a case study to investigate the techno-economic performance of the mentioned storage capacity when coupled to photo-voltaic plants to simulate deep-decarbonization scenarios. The system day-ahead optimization, performed through a Mixed Integer Linear Programming approach, aims to minimize the operational cost computed over a 24-h horizon. The results highlight that operational yearly cost savings are 5–10 % when using the multi-energy storage functionalities compared to the standard electric-to-electric operation. Despite the cost reduction, allowing only direct heating causes unavoidable thermal curtailment losses in the 6–10 % range. However, these losses can be reduced to 3 % by introducing the additional direct cooling functionality, bringing the best performances from the economic and thermodynamic standpoints.