Litcius/Paper detail

Can Regionalization of Care Reduce Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival?

Ann B. Nattinger, Nicole Rademacher, Emily L. McGinley, Nina A. Bickell, Liliana E. Pezzin

2020Medical Care16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients of low socioeconomic status (SES) have worse survival than more affluent women and are also more likely to undergo surgery in low-volume facilities. Since breast cancer patients treated in high-volume facilities have better survival, regionalizing the care of low SES patients toward high-volume facilities might reduce SES disparities in survival. OBJECTIVE: We leverage a natural experiment in New York state to examine whether a policy precluding payment for breast cancer surgery for New York Medicaid beneficiaries undergoing surgery in low-volume facilities led to reduced SES disparities in mortality. RESEARCH DESIGN: A multivariable difference-in-differences regression analysis compared mortality of low SES (dual enrollees, Medicare-Medicaid) breast cancer patients to that of wealthier patients exempt from the policy (Medicare only) for time periods before and after the policy implementation. SUBJECTS: A total of 14,183 Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer in 2006-2008 or 2014-2015. MEASURES: All-cause mortality at 3 years after diagnosis and Medicaid status, determined by Medicare administrative data. RESULTS: Both low SES and Medicare-only patients had better 3-year survival after the policy implementation. However, the decline in mortality was larger in magnitude among the low SES women than others, resulting in a 53% smaller SES survival disparity after the policy after adjustment for age, race, and comorbid illness. CONCLUSION: Regionalization of early breast cancer care away from low-volume centers may improve outcomes and reduce SES disparities in survival.

Topics & Concepts

MedicaidBreast cancerMedicineSocioeconomic statusDemographyBreast-conserving surgeryHealth equityCancerGerontologyHealth careEnvironmental healthMastectomyInternal medicinePublic healthPopulationNursingSociologyEconomicsEconomic growthGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life