Litcius/Paper detail

Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change

Mark A. Titley, Stuart H. M. Butchart, Victoria R. Jones, Mark J. Whittingham, Stephen G. Willis

2021Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences100 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

emissions. Therefore, climate change impacts on species may be disproportionately significant in countries with lower capacity for effective conservation and lower greenhouse gas emissions, raising important questions of international justice. Second, we consider the redistribution of species in the context of political boundaries since the global importance of transboundary conservation under climate change is poorly understood. Under a high-emissions scenario, we find that 35% of mammals and 29% of birds are projected to have over half of their 2070 climatic niche in countries in which they are not currently found. We map these transboundary range shifts globally, identifying borders across which international coordination might most benefit conservation and where physical border barriers, such as walls and fences, may be an overlooked obstacle to climate adaptation. Our work highlights the importance of sociopolitical context and the utility of a supranational perspective for 21st century nature conservation.

Topics & Concepts

PoliticsClimate changePolitical sciencePolitical economyEnvironmental planningDevelopment economicsEnvironmental ethicsGeographyNatural resource economicsSociologyEconomicsOceanographyGeologyPhilosophyLawSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Management and Policy
Global inequities and political borders challenge nature conservation under climate change | Litcius