Clinical Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Patients after Relapse on BCMA-Targeted CAR T
Oliver Van Oekelen, Tarek H. Mouhieddine, Darren Pan, Megan Metzger, Sarita Agte, Adolfo Aleman, David T. Melnekoff, Guido Lancman, Alessandro Laganà, Shambavi Richard, Larysa Sanchez, Joshua Richter, Hearn Jay Cho, Ajai Chari, Sundar Jagannath, Samir Parekh
Abstract
Abstract Background: Novel treatment approaches including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy and bispecific antibodies (Abs) have shown remarkable efficacy in highly pretreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients. With recent approval of BCMA-targeted CAR T in MM, and other agents in development, CAR T is poised to become more widely used in relapsed/refractory disease (RRMM). However, the prognosis, clinical outcome, and treatment approach to RRMM patients presenting with relapsed disease after CAR T are unknown. Methods: Demographics, disease characteristics and post-study outcomes were collected retrospectively in patients who relapsed after BCMA-targeted CAR T therapy at a single academic institution (Mount Sinai Hospital, NY). We identified 74 patients who previously enrolled on 1 of 6 clinical trials. At the data cutoff (July 2021), 4 patients died on trial and were not evaluable, whereas 31 patients had left the trial due to disease progression (PD) and were included. Five patients had received CAR T reinfusion after initial PD, in which case date of PD after reinfusion was considered the start of post-CAR T evaluation. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board (GCO#:11-1433). Survival analyses and follow-up duration were calculated by (reverse) Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: At time of PD after CAR T, the 31 patients had a median age of 61 years (range 35-75) and 19 (61%) were male. Median time from diagnosis was 74 months (range 22-282). Of these 26 patients (84%) had high-risk cytogenetics on FISH [t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), loss of TP53 or 1q21 gain]. Patients were highly pretreated with a median of 5 prior lines (range 1-18). 28 patients (90%) had received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Patients were refractory to various treatments: thalidomide (6% refractory), lenalidomide (74%), pomalidomide (84%), bortezomib (61%), carfilzomib (87%), ixazomib (23%), CD38-mAb (97%), alkylating agents (54%), venetoclax (19%) and selinexor (19%). Most (84%) were triple-class refractory. Fifteen patients (48%) had received DCEP and 4 (13%) had received prior treatment with non-BCMA-targeted bispecific Ab. Upon CAR T relapse, 12 patients (39%) progressed with new/increased extramedullary disease. Information on additional MM treatment was available for 28 patients (90%); 1 patient was treated with cytarabine for MDS, 1 received no treatment, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Median time from relapse to first subsequent treatment was 30 days (range 0-201). Patients received a median of 2 additional treatment lines (range 0-8). The most common initial treatment after CAR T relapse was chemotherapy with (V)DCEP or VD-PACE (10/28, 36%). Stem cell boost with prior chemotherapy was part of the initial approach in 5 patients (18%) and was performed in 12 patients at any time after CAR T relapse (43%). Five patients (18%) were treated with bispecific Ab immediately after CAR T and 12 (43%) received bispecific Ab therapy at any point after CAR T. Selinexor-based regimens were used in 3 (11%) patients immediately after and in 10 (36%) at any point after CAR T relapse. Best response to initial treatment varied widely with 46% ORR (7 CR, 5 VGPR, 1 PR, 7 SD, 8). Median time to progression was 105 days (95% CI: 78-204) for the initial treatment after CAR T. Across various treatment lines after relapse, 33 occurrences of durable response (>120 days, range 128-555) were noted, of which 8 involving stem cell transplant, 8 involving bispecific Abs (alone or in combination with approved anti-MM agents), 5 involving selinexor-based treatments, 3 with venetoclax and 3 involving a MEK inhibitor. Median PFS of patients transitioning to bispecific Ab therapy immediately after CAR T was not yet reached. At time of analysis, 16 patients (52%) were alive and median overall survival after relapse on CAR T was 15.0 months (455 days, 95% CI: 422-NE) with a median follow-up of 501 days. Conclusion: RRMM patients relapsing after T cell engager therapy are a challenging population. Studying the prognosis of these patients including response to subsequent therapy will provide important clinical insights, especially as CAR T moves to an earlier treatment setting. Even though, due to selection, our cohort might be biased towards subjects with early CAR T failure, we show that novel agents, including bispecific Abs can cause durable responses in post-CAR T relapse. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Richard: Karyopharm, Janssen: Honoraria. Richter: Oncopeptides: Consultancy; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Antengene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Chari: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Antengene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Secura Bio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shattuck Labs: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jagannath: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Parekh: Foundation Medicine Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; PFIZER: Research Funding; CELGENE: Research Funding; Karyopharm Inv: Research Funding.