Litcius/Paper detail

Suitability analysis of holographic vs light field and 2D displays for subjective quality assessment of Fourier holograms

Ayyoub Ahar, Maksymilian Chlipala, Tobias Birnbaum, Weronika Zaperty, Athanasia Symeonidou, Tomasz Kozacki, Malgorzata Kujawinska, Peter Schelkens

2020Optics Express30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Measuring the impact of compression on the reconstruction quality of holograms remains a challenge. A public subjectively-annotated holographic data set that allows for testing the performance of compression techniques and quality metrics is presented, in addition to a subjective visual quality assessment methodology. Moreover, the performance of the quality assessment procedures is compared for holographic, regular 2D and light field displays. For these experiments, a double-stimulus, multi-perspective, multi-depth testing methodology was designed and implemented. Analysis of the quality scores indicated that in the absence of a suitable holographic display and under the presented test conditions, non-holographic displays can be deployed to display numerically reconstructed holograms for visual quality assessment tasks.

Topics & Concepts

HolographyOpticsHolographic displayQuality (philosophy)Image qualityComputer scienceLight fieldQuality assessmentSet (abstract data type)Field (mathematics)Fourier transformSpatial frequencyIntegral imagingHolographic interferometryCompression (physics)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceDiffraction efficiencyData setDigital holographyStray lightQuality assuranceFast Fourier transformMaterials scienceVisualizationImage processingAdvanced Optical Imaging TechnologiesImage and Video Quality AssessmentPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Suitability analysis of holographic vs light field and 2D displays for subjective quality assessment of Fourier holograms | Litcius