Litcius/Paper detail

Degree of conversion and microhardness of different composite resins polymerized with an advanced LED-curing unit

Gozde Ozciftci, Hayal Boyacıoğlu, Murat Türkün

2025BMC Oral Health7 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the effects of different curing times (3s/10s/20s) of an advanced Light-Emitting Diode (LED) curing unit on the degree of conversion (DC%), microhardness, and hardness ratio of three different composite resin materials. METHODS: 180 cylindrical specimens (3 × 4 mm; n = 60) were prepared from PowerFill (Ivoclar, Liechtenstein), PowerFlow (Ivoclar), and Omnichroma Flow Bulk (Tokuyama, Japan). Half of the samples were used for the degree of conversion analysis (nDC = 30), and the other half for the microhardness test (n VHN = 30). All specimens were irradiated using a Light-Emitting Diode (LED) curing unit (Bluephase PowerCure, Ivoclar). Based on polymerization times: 3-second rapid, 10-second conventional, and 20-second conventional; three sub-groups were formed for each material (n = 10). The specimens' degree of conversion (DC%) was analyzed using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Microhardness values were determined using the Vickers microhardness test, and the bottom-to-upper surface hardness ratios were calculated. The degree of conversion and microhardness were analyzed with a paired t-test, ANOVA, and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Comparisons among all groups revealed significant differences in upper and bottom DCs (p < 0.05). PowerFill exhibited higher values on both surfaces after 3s polymerization, while PowerFlow required 10s and Omnichroma Flow Bulk 20s to achieve similar results (p < 0.05). When the upper surface microhardness values were compared, no significant difference was found between PowerFlow and Omnichroma Flow Bulk in the 3s group (p = 0.623) and after 20s polymerization, between PowerFill and Omnichroma Flow Bulk (p = 0.082). Material type and polymerization duration significantly affected bottom surface microhardness values (p = 0.000). As the polymerization time increased, the bottom microhardness values of all materials increased. The highest microhardness ratio (HR) was obtained in the PowerFill group at 20 s (p = 0.029). In the PowerFlow group, no difference was found between HR values of 10s and 20s (p = 0.238). For Omnichroma Flow Bulk group, all polymerization durations showed significant differences (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The polymerization performed with an advanced LED curing unit in a shorter time (3s) resulted in varying polymerization efficiencies among different types of composite resins. For more homogeneous polymerization, it is advised to extend the duration to 10 s or longer.

Topics & Concepts

PolymerizationComposite numberComposite materialHomogeneousCuring (chemistry)MedicineIndentation hardnessDegree (music)Degree of polymerizationMaterials scienceOral and maxillofacial surgeryDental materials and restorationsPhotopolymerization techniques and applicationsDental Erosion and Treatment
Degree of conversion and microhardness of different composite resins polymerized with an advanced LED-curing unit | Litcius