When should we order a next generation sequencing test in a patient with cancer?
Rámón Colomer, Rebeca Mondéjar, Nuria Romero-Laorden, Arántzazu Alfranca, Francisco Sánchez‐Madrid, Miguel Quintela-Fandiño
Abstract
Technical advances in genome sequencing and the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical oncology have paved the way for individualizing cancer patient therapy based on molecular profiles. When and how to use NGS testing in the clinic is at present an unsolved issue, although new research results provide evidence favoring this approach in some types of advanced cancer. Clinical research is evolving rapidly, from basket and umbrella trials to adaptative design precision oncology clinical studies, and genomic and molecular data often displace the classical clinical validation procedures of biomarkers. In this context, physicians must be aware of the clinical evidence behind these new biomarkers and NGS tests available, in order to use them in the right moment, and with a critical point of view. This review will present the status of currently available targeted drugs that can be effective based on actionable molecular alterations, and the NGS tests that are currently available, offering a practical guide for the application of Clinical Precision Oncology in the real world routine practice. Technical advances in genome sequencing and the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical oncology have paved the way for individualizing cancer patient therapy based on molecular profiles. When and how to use NGS testing in the clinic is at present an unsolved issue, although new research results provide evidence favoring this approach in some types of advanced cancer. Clinical research is evolving rapidly, from basket and umbrella trials to adaptative design precision oncology clinical studies, and genomic and molecular data often displace the classical clinical validation procedures of biomarkers. In this context, physicians must be aware of the clinical evidence behind these new biomarkers and NGS tests available, in order to use them in the right moment, and with a critical point of view. This review will present the status of currently available targeted drugs that can be effective based on actionable molecular alterations, and the NGS tests that are currently available, offering a practical guide for the application of Clinical Precision Oncology in the real world routine practice. Precision Oncology is the form of medicine which uses cancer treatments that are targeted to individual patients on the basis of genetic, biomarker, phenotypic, or psychosocial characteristics that distinguish a given cancer patient from other patients with similar clinical presentations [[1]Jameson J.L. Longo D.L Precision medicine–personalized, problematic, and promising.N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4; 372: 2229-2234Crossref PubMed Scopus (600) Google Scholar]. While this is not an entirely new approach in oncology, it takes advantage of recent advances in genome sequencing and the growing availability of clinical data, and also offers an unprecedented opportunity to make personalized precision patient care a clinical reality [[2]Hodson R Precision medicine.Nature. 2016 Sep 8; 537: S49Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar]. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project was undertaken in 2005 to map the human cancer genome [[3]Wheeler D.A. Wang L From human genome to cancer genome: the first decade.Genome Res. 2013 Jul; 23: 1054-1062Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar,[4]Green E.D. Watson J.D. Collins F.S Human Genome Project: twenty-five years of big biology.Nature. 2015 Oct 1; 526: 29-31Crossref PubMed Scopus (117) Google Scholar], The TCGA project, a joint effort of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), has identified new oncogenic point mutations, fusions and variants that have therapeutic impact, and impact the clinical course cancer patients. This growing data about cancer opened up the first steps towards precision oncology with the aim of ensuring that cancer patients get the right treatment at the right dose at the right time, with minimum ill consequences and maximum efficacy [[5]Mirnezami R. Nicholson J. Darzi A Preparing for precision medicine.N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9; 366: 489-491Crossref PubMed Scopus (480) Google Scholar]. While an early precedent of precision oncology was the use of tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [[6]Jordan V.C Fourteenth Gaddum Memorial LectureA current view of tamoxifen for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.Br J Pharmacol. 1993 Oct; 110: 507-517Crossref PubMed Scopus (269) Google Scholar], the first precision cancer medicines approved specifically against a molecular target were trastuzumab (for HER2+ breast cancer in 1998) and imatinib (for Bcr/abl-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in 2001). In the ensuing 20 years, the number of actionable alterations that have a corresponding targeted therapy has been growing steadily, and these include both single genes (such as BRAF or ALK), or composite genetic signatures (such as mismatch repair or homologous recombination deficiency). A timeline of the most remarkable precision oncology highlights is shown in Fig. 1. Molecular testing has become useful in clinical practice to detect actionable genomic alterations for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. As a general rule, molecular testing (like most medical testing) should be ordered when results may impact clinical management. At the end of 2019, the number of anticancer therapies targeted against a molecular alteration was 64, and the number of targetable molecular alterations was 24. It is very relevant that in 19 of these, the detection of the alteration was required in order to effectively indicate a particular prescription (Table 1).Table 1FDA approved targeted therapies in solid malignancies.†in 2019(modified from[63])..GENE TARGETGENOMIC ALTERATIONMALIGNANCYTHERAPEUTIC AGENTSEML4-ALK*Required for prescription.RearrangementLung CancerCrizotinib, Alectinib, Ceritinib, Brigatinib, LorlatinibBRAF*Required for prescription.MutationMelanomaVemurafenib, Dabrafenib, Trametinib, Cobimetinib, Encorafenib, BinimetinibMutationAnaplastic thyroid cancer, lung cancerDabrafenib, trametinibBRCA1/2*MutationOvarian Cancer, Prostate CancerOlaparib, Niraparib, Talazoparib, RucaparibMutationTriple negative breast cancerOlaparibCKIT*Required for prescription.MutationGIST, MastocytosisImatinib, Sunitinib, RegorafenibEGFR*Required for prescription.MutationLung CancerErlotinib, Gefitinib, Afatinib, Osimertinib, DacomitinibEGFR*Required for prescription.ExpressionColonCetuximab, PanitumumabLung CancersNecitumumabHER2*Required for prescription.Amplification, overexpressionBreast CancerTrastuzumab, Lapatinib, Pertuzumab, Ado-trastuzumab emtansine, NeratinibAmplification, overexpressionGastric CancerTrastuzumabFGFR3, FGFR2*Required for prescription.MutationBladder cancerErdafitinibHomologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD)*Required for prescription.CompositeOvarian cancerNiraparibC-KIT*Required for prescription.Mutation, expressionGISTImatinib, sunitinib, regorafenibMismatch Repair (MMR)*Required for prescription.Expression, mutationTumor-agnostic, MSI-H CancersPembrolizumabExpression, mutationColorectal MSI-H CancersNivolumabNTRK*Required for prescription.FusionTumor-agnostic, NTRK+ cancersEntrectinib, larotrectinibPDGFRA*Required for prescription.MutationGIST, SarcomaImatinib, Sunitinib, OlaratumabCOL1A1-PDGFΒRearrangementDermatofibrosarcoma protuberansImatinibPDL-1*Required for prescription.ExpressionLung, triple negative breast, urothelial, cervical cancerPembrolizumab, atezolizumabPI3K*Required for prescription.MutationBreast CancerAlpelisibSMO and PTCH1MutationBasal Cell CarcinomaVismodegib, SonidegibK-RAS*Required for prescription.MutationColon cancerCetuximab, panitumumab (in RAS-non mutated)RET*Required for prescription.MutationThyroid CancerVandetanib, Cabozantinib, LenvatinibROS-1*Required for prescription.RearrangementLung cancerCrizotinib, EntrectinibVEGF/VEGFRExpressionKidney, Colon, Lung, Gastric, Cervix, Ovarian CancersBevacizumab, Ramucirumab, Regorafenib, Ziv-aflibercept, Axitinib, Pazopanib, Sunitinib, SorafenibCDK4/6AmplificationBreast CancerPalbociclib, Ribociclib, AbemaciclibmTORMutationBreast, Renal, Brain CancersEverolimus, TemsirolimusEstrogen Receptor*Required for prescription.ExpressionBreast CancerTamoxifen, fulvestrant, anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, everolimus, palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclibAndrogen ReceptorExpressionProstate CancerAbiraterone, Enzalutamide, Apalutamide, Darolutamide† in 2019(modified from[[63]Chen H.Z. Bonneville R. Roychowdhury S Implementing precision cancer medicine in the genomic era.Semin Cancer Biol. 2019; 55: 16‐27Crossref PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar]). Required for prescription. Open table in a new tab Furthermore, TRK fusions and microsatellite instability have both been validated as histology-agnostic biomarkers for FDA approval of larotrectinib and entrectinib, and pembrolizumab, respectively. These markers are detected in some but not all NGS platforms, emphasizing the need for clinicians to know the differences between platforms and to keep in mind what is likely to be detected in different tumor types when initiating NGS testing. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has developed a Scale of Clinical Actionability for molecular Targets (ESCAT) that defines six levels of clinical evidence for molecular targets according to the implications for patient management [[7]Mateo J. Chakravarty D. Dienstmann R. et al.A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO scale for clinical actionability of molecular targets (ESCAT).Ann Oncol. 2018; 29: 1895-1902Summary PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The number of patients for a therapy has been to be in and in The clinical has from in to in J. of the of patients with cancer from Oncol. 1; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. of signatures sequencing in breast ESMO on Scholar]. The most relevant currently are homologous recombination and repair (like in and it has been shown that and are also with a has been which These may also be to it is also to the which be with to has been approved for patients with or of which are some of these markers need a clinical validation in clinical cancer management to Oncol. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. sequencing single tests with the of for patients and to the patient to the most clinical sequencing for treatment ESMO Scholar]. on or which results in single and or in a of clinical These can alterations that in some not The molecular NGS tests approved in the FDA that a number of genes at are the and the are also other NGS tests that are approved the FDA that target a or of as for lung cancer (in for cancer (in or (in NGS tests are in is a next-generation in diagnostic that uses from tumor to detect In 2019, it has for detection of fusions in solid In 2019, the FDA also for Oncology which and from tumor to and as as tumor and microsatellite instability The characteristics of a of NGS platforms are in The of NGS platforms in a testing with a may have a similar to that of testing or alterations et of targeted next-generation sequencing in routine care for relevant molecular in lung results of a on 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The although not may of in of and other genetic number alterations, Cancer single and microsatellite variants and in and from genes lung number alterations, number alterations, Oncology for of and number alterations, fusions for lung number alterations, and and lung Molecular lung BRAF BRAF Molecular and of Open table in a new tab In the of genetic tests has been at the R. J. J. J. D. of genetic testing in a PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The European for has to Scholar], although has not of sequencing testing. are for the detection of alterations in may be to tumor (in the tumor or (in different of tumor or of and different sequencing A recent of and with that was a of to a as of and tumor et of NGS tests with tumor are a of 2019, Scholar]. In some in which the was years the of advanced the may not be in for NGS It has been that from cancer of years are not for NGS et for Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. In these should be or NGS should be the most relevant and not for NGS testing is the of in but the early steps of and implications for early cancer PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. in cancer, to as (for are also in and other that to in in relevant of the cancer as or in in a to the of in tumor sequencing This has been a of and may be to an efficacy of the tumor as or et trastuzumab in patients with cancer with or results from the targeted and in Scholar]. is an need to and NGS and NGS results in order to that the of a very number of patient results patient and is a therapeutic and to the real of these based on the ESMO and the FDA Precision have been with clinical although a number are and of these trials are in the of umbrella trials or basket trials precision medicine and Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. trials patients of different that the genomic all patients the trials patients of the and them different genomic alterations, a different to These trials are to the efficacy of a in a and of to precision medicine tumor molecular targets and the number of and of patients in these studies, are most often not to the efficacy of the drugs in of although the of the treatment that has been to drugs to patients et of NGS tests with tumor are a of 2019, et based on tumor molecular the of precision medicine Cancer PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. different types of precision medicine have been to and some of them have evidence that targeted therapies can be given in a histology-agnostic based on molecular The was the first precision medicine therapy based on tumor molecular treatment at in patients with types of that of care treatment et targeted therapy based on molecular therapy for advanced cancer a Oncol. 2015 Oct; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. This patients for a molecular alteration was identified of molecular which be to of available targeted everolimus, letrozole, patients were to the and to the was in the and in the The of the was not with in between the treatment These results that the treatment in targeted therapies according to the of some genetic alterations was not to when The that routine use of targeted should be although in clinical trials should be to biomarkers of The Molecular for Cancer was a that the clinical of genomic in different types of advanced cancer NGS testing was on a A of patients were with a targeted and were in patients et and clinical in advanced results of the PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The that patients a the of and that the was tumor sequencing in of patients with advanced that targeted The is a basket in patients with solid molecular alterations in or the in this were and respectively. were most in the HER2+ and the BRAF lung cancer J.D. et therapy for advanced solid on the basis of molecular results from an basket Oncol. 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The that the targeted therapy in solid tumor types not currently for these The is a of basket or in cancer patients with an actionable The uses a design with a and based on testing of or genetic alterations were in and or were with of the in tumor types E.D. J. et a of basket PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The that the was a it to patient to and The Society of Clinical Oncology the and is an that to of of targeted anticancer drugs for treatment of patients with advanced cancer that have a actionable genomic are currently and have therapy Feb on Scholar]. or from in a of have been of which et trastuzumab in patients with cancer with or results from the targeted and in et in patients with cancer with BRAF results from the targeted and in et in patients with breast cancer with tumor results from the targeted and Oncol. 2019; Google et in patients with cancer with tumor results from the targeted and in R et in patients with lung cancer with results from the targeted and Oncol. 2019; Google Scholar], negative and have results (Table have been in the were trastuzumab in or cancer, in BRAF cancer, in breast cancer with in cancer with and in lung cancer with alterations, The most recent results of the indicate that this approach is in order to new of with the use of targeted drugs in that have been as of on or tumor et trastuzumab in patients with cancer with or results from the targeted and in tumor Feb on or and or or BRAF and BRAF BRAF or on Open table in a new tab Oncology NGS with in number markers Open table in a new tab some umbrella targeted therapy based on molecular of these is the a targeted therapy in patients with advanced was new markers and not et a targeted therapy in patients with advanced lung Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. In 2019, precision oncology that use genetic NGS testing to guide cancer therapy in patients with advanced have been of these has an approach (Table J. R. et and precision cancer medicine: the Med. PubMed Scopus Google et the use of anticancer Oct; PubMed Scopus Google R. et of cancer patients personalized the Med. PubMed Scopus Google et of to patient for early clinical the Med. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The from the sequencing or in tumor and in patients et a targeted therapy in patients with advanced lung Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. were detected (NGS) and in patients negative for genome based relevant was and patients in A and in were for was in patients in A and in The identified that status and a with clinical the not end point to a of were some that the of a clinical management that and also that the design patients to a clinical or to or The is an that to of in of patients with tumor types and molecular are with anticancer drugs of approved In this patients with all types of cancer were the opportunity to a tumor for sequencing anticancer In a of were was not although clinical was all types of of treatment with of and with of The identified a of with microsatellite and a of and also an of patients with cancer with that a with The of Cancer genomic tumor and the NGS of tumor the were a precision therapy of molecular were most treatment were not The a of of a number The was based on NGS and also on of the Molecular which on of molecular The was to use tumor to actionable alterations in patients and them to clinical trials et of to patient for early clinical the Med. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. a with which data was for of to tumor in the first data with tumor and results were available a for Molecular When a actionable were identified in patients and of these patients a In of these, an was A was the of available trials or the status that not form of In the new of that include and will the number of relevant actionable molecular alterations, and the results Molecular in precision medicine Med. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. are clinical trials and sequencing to a number of different tumor histology-agnostic that will end in are the from has and the from the to the precision medicine trials and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. are the Cancer and from the that to the Cancer or that to and the and that to and respectively. have a approach towards NGS and have that currently NGS may be useful in research or clinical of drugs is to patient S The of anticancer Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. that a of patients with cancer a for that NGS for precision oncology based on biomarkers an J. Dienstmann R Precision the from the 2018; Oct PubMed Scopus Google et on precision medicine for a from the Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. In other that routine NGS testing should be for all patients with cancer with of care next-generation sequencing tests be on all cancer 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. In the use of to a number of targets molecular testing and this in a to detect an effective D. Precision and When PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. Furthermore, NGS testing may or repair signatures that can a to that not be in which a on molecular as advanced lung cancer, the use of a NGS at is given the growing number of actionable alterations and the to at the all the D. Precision and When PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. The that the most available for advanced lung cancer have a tumor are is very relevant in this J. et for testing in advanced lung a of the of and the of medical oncology of Oct Oncol. 2019; Google Scholar]. In of the of for clinical testing were et testing and with tests and use of target for advanced lung a 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], and the NGS a for or biomarkers on and or on are other tumor types is as or although NGS testing is currently to NGS in lung cancer is that molecular alterations in other can also be present in a of as that are to or treatment with from PubMed Scopus Google (in this NGS is or microsatellite and NGS to the opportunity of testing for these and biomarkers. The of genomic markers is In a recent a that NGS was testing for advanced in the in patient management et impact of sequencing testing to detect genomic alterations in lung cancer a Clinical Oncol. 2018; Google Scholar]. the results in patients with from a different as the of is in et on precision medicine for a from the Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], and a different of precision medicine treatment was not as treatment for lung D. et of precision medicine in the treatment of lung an early of targeted PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. Furthermore, next-generation sequencing may be of in what has been as to anticancer or patients with J.L. et of the of clinical in Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. A of the medical identified of and the most of therapy was targeted therapies J. A review of to anticancer drugs in the J 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. the that of to a given in the a of to of or as the from PubMed Scopus Google will NGS testing to these and for the of precision oncology with 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. are in a number of and often therapy is not to these are often not in clinical trials that the of are and cancer of In is the treatment but is has the genomic differences between the and cancer of and implications for clinical Oncol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. is a of patients in testing was were differences in between and and repair alterations in alterations in the and alterations in both types of Clinical was with and J. J.D. et of and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. NGS of identified fusions of and have been with larotrectinib A and TRK Oncol. 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. of have and be targeted with and an of have repair and be for The the with advanced cancer, and to molecular targeted in of which six an D. et medicine for patients with advanced an effective the J PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. are a of with and the of detected NGS are not and not clinical for patients R. J. Precision oncology in and Oncol. 2019; Scholar]. for a patient with treatment a clinical based on data may the treatment of research At therapies are approved in the of a with The and of has been the years, and highlights a number of tumor actionable mutations, most in and molecular and precision therapies of Sep Cancer Biol. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. These alterations have been in of patients that were with NGS et sequencing in patients with and Res. Google Scholar]. A recent review of NGS on patients with of that with therapeutic were identified in of patients D. et of and of genomic Med. 2018; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. It is that results from the that were the most project precision medicine an PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. use of NGS and precision medicine is to patients to a particular clinical This of course an of Clinical and new clinical is an unprecedented in the design of cancer clinical as trials or new as with basket and umbrella at the Dienstmann R. et clinical in the of precision Oncol. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. Clinical must molecular testing in cancer a NGS is not in a number of In a NGS should not be ordered when the genomic will most likely not have an impact in cancer clinical management. patients treatment not will not have actionable alterations NGS what can be from in the of breast et testing and with tests and use of target for advanced lung a 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar]. In with a cancer, or with an of should as a rule, be These patients should most often be for Clinical should also the of targetable alterations in a advanced lung cancer in an in a number of sequencing has been with NGS sequencing the of NGS testing is that will need to be in the will include should provide for NGS testing of the of the of tests that are to a and the for of therapeutic precision oncology is a new of to clinical next-generation sequencing clinical and 2016 PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar]. have shown that NGS is most for patients have an advanced cancer in which are identified molecular when are useful at the NGS testing can be in patients to clinical and can individual in patients with other NGS may be currently the of a targetable is D.L genetic markers at Oncol. 2019; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar], the cancer is in early with and effective of or the patient has an with very As with other and patients must be an NGS that will have an impact of the therapeutic In molecular testing must be when therapeutic targets be molecular were