Litcius/Paper detail

Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration

Yumao Chen, Ming Chen, Yang Gao, Feng Zhang, Min Jin, Shijun Lu, Minxuan Han

2022ACS Omega19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

silk nanofiber (BSn) membranes were prepared by physical shearing. The diameters of the TSn and BSn membranes were 146.09 ± 63.56 and 120.99 ± 91.32 nm, respectively. TSn showed a Young's modulus of 3.61 ± 0.64 GPa and a tensile strength of 74.27 ± 5.19 MPa, which were superior to those of BSn, with a Young's modulus of 0.16 ± 0.03 GPa and a tensile strength of 4.86 ± 0.61 MPa. The potential of TSn and BSn membranes to guide bone regeneration was explored. In vitro, the TSn membrane exhibited significantly higher cell proliferation for MC3T3-E1 cells than the BSn membrane. In a cranial bone defect in a rat model, the TSn and BSn membranes displayed superior bone regeneration compared to the control because the membrane prevented the ingrowth of soft tissue to the defective area. Compared to the BSn membrane, the TSn membrane improved damaged bone regeneration, presumably due to its superior mechanical properties, high osteoconductivity, and increased cell proliferation. The TSn membrane has a bionic structure, excellent mechanical properties, and greater biocompatibility, making it an ideal candidate for GBR.

Topics & Concepts

MembraneFibroinNanofiberMaterials scienceBiocompatibilityUltimate tensile strengthSILKRegeneration (biology)Biomedical engineeringBiomaterialChemistryComposite materialMedicineCell biologyNanotechnologyBiologyBiochemistryMetallurgySilk-based biomaterials and applicationsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Biological Efficacy Comparison of Natural Tussah Silk and Mulberry Silk Nanofiber Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration | Litcius