Litcius/Paper detail

Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 3. Performance Metrics

Shahriar Faghani, Bardia Khosravi, Kuan Zhang, Mana Moassefi, Jaidip Jagtap, Fred Nugen, Sanaz Vahdati, Shiba Kuanar, Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad-Mousavi, Yashbir Singh, Diana V. Vera-Garcia, Pouria Rouzrokh, Bradley J. Erickson

2022Radiology Artificial Intelligence92 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The increasing use of machine learning (ML) algorithms in clinical settings raises concerns about bias in ML models. Bias can arise at any step of ML creation, including data handling, model development, and performance evaluation. Potential biases in the ML model can be minimized by implementing these steps correctly. This report focuses on performance evaluation and discusses model fitness, as well as a set of performance evaluation toolboxes: namely, performance metrics, performance interpretation maps, and uncertainty quantification. By discussing the strengths and limitations of each toolbox, our report highlights strategies and considerations to mitigate and detect biases during performance evaluations of radiology artificial intelligence models. Keywords: Segmentation, Diagnosis, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) © RSNA, 2022

Topics & Concepts

Machine learningArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkToolboxMedicineInterpretation (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)SegmentationDeep learningArtificial neural networkComputer scienceProgramming languageRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMedical Imaging and Analysis