Assessment of Central Nervous System Lymphoma Based on CXCR4 Expression In Vivo Using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/MRI
Angelika M. Starzer, Anna S. Berghoff, Tatjana Traub‐Weidinger, Alexander Haug, Georg Widhalm, Marcus Hacker, Ivo Rausch, Matthias Preusser, Marius E. Mayerhoefer
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT: F-FDG PET is limited for assessment of central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) due to physiologic tracer accumulation in the brain. We prospectively evaluated the novel PET tracer Ga-pentixafor, which targets the C-X-C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), for lesion visualization and response assessment of CNSL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven CNSL patients underwent Ga-pentixafor PET/MRI with contrast enhancement (CE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted sequences. The accuracy of Ga-pentixafor PET for CNSL lesion detection relative to the CE-MRI reference standard was determined. Standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax), PET-based (PTV) and MRI-based (VOLMRI) tumor volumes, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were assessed, and correlation coefficients were calculated. Three SUVmax thresholds (41%, 50%, and 70%) were evaluated for PTV definitions (PTV41%, PTV50%, and PTV70%) and tested against VOLMRI using paired sample t tests. RESULTS: Twelve Ga-pentixafor PET/MRI examinations (including 5 follow-up scans) of 7 patients were evaluated. Ga-pentixafor PET demonstrated 18 lesions, all of which were confirmed by CE-MRI; there were no false-positive lesions on PET (accuracy, 100%). PTV41% showed the highest concordance with lesion morphology, with no significant difference compared with VOLMRI (mean difference, -0.24 cm; P = 0.45). The correlation between ADCmean and SUVmean41% (r = 0.68) was moderate. Changes in PTV41% on follow-up PET/MRI showed the same trend as VOLMRI changes, including progression of 1 lesion each in patient 1 (+456.0% PTV41% and +350.8% VOLMRI) and patient 3 (+110.4% PTV41% and +85.1% VOLMRI). CONCLUSIONS: Ga-pentixafor PET may be feasible for assessment and follow-up of CNSL. Future studies need to focus on testing its clinical value to distinguish between glioma and CNSL, and between radiation-induced inflammation and viable residual tumor.