Litcius/Paper detail

Carbon footprint distributions of lithium-ion batteries and their materials

Leopold Peiseler, Vanessa Schenker, Karin Schatzmann, Stephan Pfister, Vanessa Wood, Tobias S. Schmidt

2024Nature Communications96 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Lithium-ion batteries are pivotal in climate change mitigation. While their own carbon footprint raises concerns, existing studies are scattered, hard to compare and largely overlook the relevance of battery materials. Here, we go beyond traditional carbon footprint analysis and develop a cost-based approach, estimating emission curves for battery materials lithium, nickel and cobalt, based on mining cost data. Combining the emission curves with regionalised battery production announcements, we present carbon footprint distributions (5 th , 50 th , and 95 th percentiles) for lithium-ion batteries with nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC811, 8-1-1 ratio; 59, 74 and 115 kg CO2 kWh −1 ) and lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP; 54, 62, 69 kg CO2 kWh −1 ) cathodes. Our findings reveal the dominating impact of material sourcing over production location, with nickel and lithium identified as major contributors to the carbon footprint and its variance. This research moves the field forward by offering a nuanced understanding of battery carbon footprints, aiding in the design of decarbonisation policies and strategies.

Topics & Concepts

Carbon footprintLithium (medication)Carbon fibersBattery (electricity)Environmental scienceCobaltFootprintNickelMaterials scienceGreenhouse gasMetallurgyGeologyPhysicsComposite materialPower (physics)Quantum mechanicsPaleontologyOceanographyComposite numberMedicineEndocrinologyExtraction and Separation ProcessesElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureAdvanced Battery Technologies Research