Litcius/Paper detail

Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Eight Commercial Assays for the Detection of Measles Virus-Specific IgM Antibodies

Joanne Hiebert, Vanessa Zubach, Carmen Charlton, Jayne Fenton, Graham Tipples, Kevin Fonseca, Alberto Severini

2021Journal of Clinical Microbiology31 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

= 187) were collected from individuals presenting with other fever and rash illnesses. A total of 7 ELISA kits (Euroimmun native antigens and recombinant nucleoprotein, IBL, Clin-Tech Microimmune, NovaTec NovaLisa, Serion, and Siemens Enzygnost) and one CLIA method (DiaSorin LIAISON XL) were evaluated. The ELISA kits included two IgM capture methods and five indirect methods. Calculated sensitivities and specificities ranged from 75.0% to 98.1% and 86.6% to 99.5%, respectively. The parvovirus B19 IgM positive sera were noted to cause false-positive results, particularly for the ELISA kits from Serion and NovaLisa; specificities for this subset of samples ranged from 51.4% to 100.0%. The capture IgM ELISA methods provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity.

Topics & Concepts

RubellaMeaslesMeasles virusMedicineVirologyImmunoglobulin MImmunoassayAntibodyImmunologyImmunoglobulin GVaccinationParvovirus B19 Infection StudiesVirology and Viral DiseasesImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy of Eight Commercial Assays for the Detection of Measles Virus-Specific IgM Antibodies | Litcius