Litcius/Paper detail

Properties of polyurethane foam with fourth-generation blowing agent

Vladimir Yakushin, Uģis Cābulis, Velta Fridrihsone, Sergey Kravchenko, Romass Pauliks

2021e-Polymers19 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Climate change makes it imperative to use materials with minimum global warming potential. The fourth-generation blowing agent HCFO-1233zd-E is one of them. The use of HCFO allows the production of polyurethane foam with low thermal conductivity. Thermal conductivity, like other foam properties, depends not only on the density but also on the cellular structure of the foam. The cellular structure, in turn, depends on the technological parameters of foam production. A comparison of pouring and spray foams of the same low density has shown that the cellular structure of spray foam consists of cells with much less sizes than pouring foam. Due to the small size of cells, spray foam has a lower radiative constituent in the foam conductivity and, as a result, a lower overall thermal conductivity than pouring foam. The water absorption of spray foam, due to the fine cellular structure, also is lower than that of pouring foam. Pouring foam with bigger cells has higher compressive strength and modulus of elasticity in the foam rise direction. On the contrary, spray foam with a fine cellular structure has higher strength and modulus in the perpendicular direction. The effect of foam aging on thermal conductivity was also studied.

Topics & Concepts

Thermal conductivityPolyurethaneBlowing agentMaterials scienceComposite materialFoaming agentYoung's modulusModulusMetal foamAir permeability specific surfaceConductivityPorosityChemistryPhysical chemistryLayer (electronics)Polymer Foaming and CompositesPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsCatalysis and Oxidation Reactions
Properties of polyurethane foam with fourth-generation blowing agent | Litcius