Litcius/Paper detail

Aerobic <scp>high‐intensity</scp> intervals are superior to improve VO<sub>2max</sub> compared with sprint intervals in <scp>well‐trained</scp> men

Håkon Hov, Eivind Wang, Yi Rui Lim, Glenn Trane, Magnus Hemmingsen, Jan Hoff, Jan Helgerud

2022Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports32 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O 2max ) may be the single most important factor for long‐distance running performance. Interval training, enabling high intensity, is forwarded as the format that yields the largest increase in V̇O 2max . However, it is uncertain if an optimal outcome on V̇O 2max , anaerobic capacity, and running performance is provided by training with a high aerobic intensity or high overall intensity. Thus, we randomized 48 aerobically well‐trained men (23 ± 3 years) to three commonly applied interval protocols, one with high aerobic intensity (HIIT) and two with high absolute intensity (sprint interval training; SIT), 3× week for 8 weeks: (1) HIIT: 4 × 4 min at ~95% maximal aerobic speed (MAS) with 3 min active breaks. (2) SIT: 8 × 20 s at ~150% MAS with 10 s passive breaks. (3) SIT: 10 × 30 s at ~175% MAS with 3.5 min active breaks. V̇O 2max increased more ( p &lt; 0.001) following HIIT, 4 × 4 min (6.5 ± 2.4%, p &lt; 0.001) than SIT, 8 × 20 s (3.3 ± 2.4%, p &lt; 0.001) and SIT, 10 × 30 s (n.s.). This was accompanied by a larger ( p &lt; 0.05) increase in stroke volume (O 2 ‐pulse) following HIIT, 4 × 4 min (8.1 ± 4.1%, p &lt; 0.001) compared with SIT, 8 × 20 s (3.8 ± 4.2%, p &lt; 0.01) and SIT, 10 × 30 (n.s.). Anaerobic capacity (maximal accumulated oxygen deficit) increased following SIT, 8 × 20 s ( p &lt; 0.05), but not after HIIT, 4 × 4 min, nor SIT, 10 × 30 s. Long‐distance (3000‐m) endurance performance increased ( p &lt; 0.05– p &lt; 0.001) in all groups (HIIT, 4 × 4 min: 5.9 ± 3.2%; SIT, 8 × 20 s: 4.1 ± 3.7%; SIT, 10 × 30 s: 2.2 ± 2.2%), with HIIT increasing more than SIT, 10 × 30 s ( p &lt; 0.05). Sprint (300‐m) performance exhibited within‐group increases in SIT, 8 × 20 s (4.4 ± 2.0%) and SIT, 10 × 30 s (3.3 ± 2.8%). In conclusion, HIIT improves V̇O 2max more than SIT. Given the importance of V̇O 2max for most endurance performance scenarios, HIIT should typically be the chosen interval format.

Topics & Concepts

SprintInterval trainingHigh-intensity interval trainingVO2 maxAnaerobic exerciseAnimal scienceAerobic exerciseIntensity (physics)Aerobic capacityMedicineCardiologyPhysical therapyMathematicsInternal medicineHeart ratePhysicsBiologyBlood pressureQuantum mechanicsSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports injuries and prevention