Surgical modality for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer among the elderly: analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database
Weixi Wang, Yan Sun, Huiting Li, Minwei Bao, Xiaogang Liu, Gening Jiang, Cong Ye, Yu Hu
Abstract
Background: The appropriate surgical modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) among the elderly remains controversial; identifying appropriate modalities will be helpful in clinical practice. Methods: It’s a cohort study and we explored the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for identifying patients aged ≥70 years with pathologic stage IA NSCLC. Three types of surgeries were compared (lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection) via survival and stratification analyses. Results: Overall, 6,197 patients were enrolled. Among patients aged ≥76 years with tumor diameters ≤1 cm, significant differences in survival were noted for segmentectomy vs. lobectomy [hazard ratio (HR) =0.294, P=0.007] and wedge resection vs. lobectomy (HR =0.548, P=0.017) but not in those with tumors diameters >1 cm. Among patients aged 70–75 years with tumor diameters >1–2 cm, significant differences in survival were observed for segmentectomy vs. lobectomy (HR =0.671, P=0.037) and segmentectomy vs. wedge resection (HR =0.556, P=0.003) and for wedge resection vs. lobectomy (HR =1.283, P=0.003) among those with tumor diameters >2–3 cm but not in those with tumor diameters ≤1 cm. Conclusions: Both age and tumor size should be considered when selecting the surgical modality. Lobectomy is not recommended for lesions ≤1 cm among patients aged ≥76 years. Segmentectomy was associated with superior prognosis for tumor diameters >1–2 cm and survival favored lobectomy rather than wedge resection for NSCLCs >2–3 cm among patients aged 70–75 years. Surgeons could rely on personal experience to determine the appropriate surgical modality for NSCLCs >1 cm among patients aged ≥76 years and NSCLCs ≤1 cm among patients aged 70–75 years.