Positron range in combination with point-spread-function correction: an evaluation of different implementations for [124I]-PET imaging
Hunor Kertész, Maurizio Conti, Vladimir Panin, Jorge Cabello, Deepak Bharkhada, Thomas Beyer, László Papp, Walter Jentzen, Jacobo Cal-González, Joaquín L. Herraiz, Alejandro López-Montes, Ivo Rausch
Abstract
Abstract Aim To evaluate the effect of combining positron range correction (PRC) with point-spread-function (PSF) correction and to compare different methods of implementation into iterative image reconstruction for 124 I-PET imaging. Materials and methods Uniform PR blurring kernels of 124 I were generated using the GATE (GEANT4) framework in various material environments (lung, water, and bone) and matched to a 3D matrix. The kernels size was set to 11 × 11 × 11 based on the maximum PR in water and the voxel size of the PET system. PET image reconstruction was performed using the standard OSEM algorithm, OSEM with PRC implemented before the forward projection (OSEM+PRC simplified) and OSEM with PRC implemented in both forward- and back-projection steps (full implementation) (OSEM+PRC). Reconstructions were repeated with resolution recovery, point-spread function (PSF) included. The methods and kernel variation were validated using different phantoms filled with 124 I acquired on a Siemens mCT PET/CT system. The data was evaluated for contrast recovery and image noise. Results Contrast recovery improved by 2–10% and 4–37% with OSEM+PRC simplified and OSEM+PRC, respectively, depending on the sphere size of the NEMA IQ phantom. Including PSF in the reconstructions further improved contrast by 4–19% and 3–16% with the PSF+PRC simplified and PSF+PRC, respectively. The benefit of PRC was more pronounced within low-density material. OSEM-PRC and OSEM-PSF as well as OSEM-PSF+PRC in its full- and simplified implementation showed comparable noise and convergence. OSEM-PRC simplified showed comparably faster convergence but at the cost of increased image noise. Conclusions The combination of the PSF and PRC leads to increased contrast recovery with reduced image noise compared to stand-alone PSF or PRC reconstruction. For OSEM-PRC reconstructions, a full implementation in the reconstruction is necessary to handle image noise. For the combination of PRC with PSF, a simplified PRC implementation can be used to reduce reconstruction times.