Litcius/Paper detail

Assessment of Low-Cost and Higher-End Soil Moisture Sensors across Various Moisture Ranges and Soil Textures

Rajesh Nandi, Dev Shrestha

2024Sensors24 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The accuracy and unit cost of sensors are important factors for a continuous soil moisture monitoring system. This study compares the accuracy of four soil moisture sensors differing in unit costs in coarse-, fine-, and medium-textured soils. The sensor outputs were recorded for the VWC, ranging from 0% to 50%. Low-cost capacitive and resistive sensors were evaluated with and without the external 16-bit analog-to-digital converter ADS1115 to improve their performances without adding much cost. Without ADS1115, using only Arduino’s built-in analog-to-digital converter, the low-cost sensors had a maximum RMSE of 4.79% (v/v) for resistive sensors and 3.78% for capacitive sensors in medium-textured soil. The addition of ADS1115 showed improved performance of the low-cost sensors, with a maximum RMSE of 2.64% for resistive sensors and 1.87% for capacitive sensors. The higher-end sensors had an RMSE of up to 1.8% for VH400 and up to 0.95% for the 5TM sensor. The RMSE differences between higher-end and low-cost sensors with the use of ADS1115 were not statistically significant.

Topics & Concepts

MoistureEnvironmental scienceWater contentSoil scienceSoil textureRemote sensingSoil waterGeologyGeotechnical engineeringGeographyMeteorologySoil Moisture and Remote SensingSoil Geostatistics and MappingSoil and Unsaturated Flow