Litcius/Paper detail

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Requiring Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Patrick Badertscher, Stefan Stortecky, Teodor Serban, Sven Knecht, Dik Heg, David Tueller, Raban Jeger, Oliver Reuthebuch, Olivier Müller, Stefan Toggweiler, Peter Wenaweser, Christoph Huber, Marco Roffi, Enrico Ferrari, Tobias Reichlin, Thomas Nestelberger, Felix Mahfoud, Michael Kühne, Christian Sticherling

2025JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions26 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of pacemaker (PM) implantation on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains controversial, especially as TAVR indications expand to low-risk patients. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the all-cause and cardiovascular mortality of patients undergoing PM implantation after TAVR. METHODS: In this prospective, observational, nationwide TAVR cohort study, the outcomes of patients undergoing permanent PM implantation were investigated. Patients were enrolled from 19 centers across Switzerland between February 2011 and June 2022. RESULTS: Among 13,360 patients enrolled (mean age 82 ± 7 years, 47% female, self-expanding valves 48%, median follow-up 889 days [Q1-Q3: 365-1,765 days]), 2,028 (15%) required PM implantation within 30 days post-TAVR. Patients requiring post-TAVR PM implantation were older (82 ± 6 years of age vs 81 ± 7 years of age), were predominantly male (58% vs 50%), and more often had atrial fibrillation (34% vs 29%). At 1-year follow-up, these patients had higher overall mortality (aHR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.05-1.26; P = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (aHR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06-1.46; P = 0.006). These trends persisted at 5- and 10-year follow-up. After multivariable adjustments, significantly higher rates of cardiovascular mortality, LVEF decline ≥10%, and NYHA functional class III or IV at 1-year follow-up were observed (aHR: 1.44,; 95% CI: 1.35-1.54; P < 0.001), along with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates at 5- and 10-year follow-up in patients requiring PM implantation following TAVR compared with those not needing a PM. CONCLUSIONS: In this large nationwide registry, patients receiving PM implantation within 30 days after TAVR had significantly higher rates of overall and cardiovascular mortality up to 10 years. (SwissTAVI Registry; NCT01368250).

Topics & Concepts

MedicineTerm (time)Permanent pacemakerAortic valve replacementCardiologyValve replacementInternal medicineStenosisPhysicsQuantum mechanicsCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes