Litcius/Paper detail

Non-Wilson-Fisher kinks of $O(N)$ numerical bootstrap: from the deconfined phase transition to a putative new family of CFTs

Yin-Chen He, Junchen Rong, Ning Su

2021SciPost Physics30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

It is well established that the O(N) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> Wilson-Fisher (WF) CFT sits at a kink of the numerical bounds from bootstrapping four point function of O(N) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> vector. Moving away from the WF kinks, there indeed exists another family of kinks (dubbed non-WF kinks) on the curve of O(N) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> numerical bounds. Different from the O(N) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> WF kinks that exist for arbitary N <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> in 2&lt;d&lt;4 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> dimensions, the non-WF kinks exist in arbitrary dimensions but only for a large enough N&gt;N_c(d) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mi>c</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in a given dimension d <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> </mml:math> . In this paper we have achieved a thorough understanding for few special cases of these non-WF kinks, which already hints interesting physics. The first case is the O(4) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> bootstrap in 2d, where the non-WF kink turns out to be the SU(2)_1 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>U</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> Wess-Zumino-Witten (WZW) model, and all the SU(2)_{k&gt;2} <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>U</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">)</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>k</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> WZW models saturate the numerical bound on the left side of the kink. This is a mirror version of the Z_2 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>Z</mml:mi> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:math> bootstrap, where the 2d Ising CFT sits at a kink while all the other minimal models saturating the bound on the right. We further carry out dimensional continuation of the 2d SU(2)_1 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>S</mml:mi> <mml:mi>U</mml:mi>

Topics & Concepts

Dimension (graph theory)PhysicsPhase transitionPoint (geometry)Function (biology)Statistical physicsPhase (matter)Theoretical physicsWork (physics)MathematicsCurse of dimensionalityNumerical analysisCritical phenomenaTerm (time)Sequence (biology)Mode (computer interface)Perspective (graphical)Order (exchange)Bootstrapping (finance)Nonlinear Photonic SystemsNonlinear Waves and SolitonsGeometric and Algebraic Topology
Non-Wilson-Fisher kinks of $O(N)$ numerical bootstrap: from the deconfined phase transition to a putative new family of CFTs | Litcius