Litcius/Paper detail

Unveiling a new era with liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to enhance parathyroid hormone measurement in patients with chronic kidney disease

Etienne Cavalier, Jordi Farré-Segura, Pierre Lukas, Anne-Sophie Gendebien, Stéphanie Peeters, Philippe Massonnet, Caroline Le Goff, Antoine Bouquegneau, Jean–Claude Souberbielle, Vincent Delatour, Pierre Delanaye

2023Kidney International18 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Precise determination of circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration is crucial to diagnose and manage various disease conditions, including the chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder. However, the lack of standardization in PTH assays is challenging for clinicians, potentially leading to medical errors because the different assays do not provide equivalent results and use different reference ranges. Here, we aimed to evaluate the impact of recalibrating PTH immunoassays by means of a recently developed LC-MS/MS method as the reference. Utilizing a large panel of pooled plasma samples with PTH concentrations determined by the LC-MS/MS method calibrated with the World Health Organization (WHO) 95/646 International Standard, five PTH immunoassays were recalibrated. The robustness of this standardization was evaluated over time using different sets of samples. The recalibration successfully reduced inter-assay variability with harmonization of PTH measurements across different assays. By recalibrating the assays based on the WHO 95/646 International Standard, we demonstrated the feasibility for standardizing PTH measurement results and adopting common reference ranges for PTH assays, facilitating a more consistent interpretation of PTH values. The recalibration process aligns PTH results obtained from various immunoassays with the LC-MS/MS method, providing more consistent and reliable measurements. Thus, establishing true standardization across all PTH assays is crucial to ensure consistent interpretation and clinical decision-making. Precise determination of circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration is crucial to diagnose and manage various disease conditions, including the chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder. However, the lack of standardization in PTH assays is challenging for clinicians, potentially leading to medical errors because the different assays do not provide equivalent results and use different reference ranges. Here, we aimed to evaluate the impact of recalibrating PTH immunoassays by means of a recently developed LC-MS/MS method as the reference. Utilizing a large panel of pooled plasma samples with PTH concentrations determined by the LC-MS/MS method calibrated with the World Health Organization (WHO) 95/646 International Standard, five PTH immunoassays were recalibrated. The robustness of this standardization was evaluated over time using different sets of samples. The recalibration successfully reduced inter-assay variability with harmonization of PTH measurements across different assays. By recalibrating the assays based on the WHO 95/646 International Standard, we demonstrated the feasibility for standardizing PTH measurement results and adopting common reference ranges for PTH assays, facilitating a more consistent interpretation of PTH values. The recalibration process aligns PTH results obtained from various immunoassays with the LC-MS/MS method, providing more consistent and reliable measurements. Thus, establishing true standardization across all PTH assays is crucial to ensure consistent interpretation and clinical decision-making. Lay SummaryAccurate diagnosis and treatment of chronic kidney disease–related mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBDs) hinge on measuring parathyroid hormone (PTH). Unfortunately, current PTH tests often yield inconsistent results, complicating clinical practice. To address this, standardizing PTH measurement methods is essential. Achieving this standardization requires advanced mass spectrometry techniques and understanding whether certain substances in the blood of chronic kidney disease and hemodialyzed patients affect PTH measurements. Recent advances in mass spectrometry revealed that a potentially problematic PTH fragment (7–84) was absent in patients’ blood, alleviating concerns. In addition, oxidized PTH was not detected and circulating fragments did not interfere PTH assays. As a result, we explored recalibrating 5 different PTH kits on to a precise liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry reference method. The outcomes were promising, aligning PTH results across various immunoassays with the reference method. This calibration process promises more reliable and consistent PTH measurements, ultimately enhancing patient care by reducing result variability. Accurate diagnosis and treatment of chronic kidney disease–related mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBDs) hinge on measuring parathyroid hormone (PTH). Unfortunately, current PTH tests often yield inconsistent results, complicating clinical practice. To address this, standardizing PTH measurement methods is essential. Achieving this standardization requires advanced mass spectrometry techniques and understanding whether certain substances in the blood of chronic kidney disease and hemodialyzed patients affect PTH measurements. Recent advances in mass spectrometry revealed that a potentially problematic PTH fragment (7–84) was absent in patients’ blood, alleviating concerns. In addition, oxidized PTH was not detected and circulating fragments did not interfere PTH assays. As a result, we explored recalibrating 5 different PTH kits on to a precise liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry reference method. The outcomes were promising, aligning PTH results across various immunoassays with the reference method. This calibration process promises more reliable and consistent PTH measurements, ultimately enhancing patient care by reducing result variability. Beyond its paramount importance in diagnosing and managing various endocrine conditions such as primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism, hypoparathyroidism, and pseudohypoparathyroidism, the measurement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) is routinely conducted in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease–Mineral and Bone Disorder recommends monitoring PTH levels in CKD patients beginning in CKD G3a and suggests maintaining PTH levels of hemodialyzed (HD) patients at ∼2 to 9 times the upper limit of the normal (ULN) values of the assay used.1Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Update Work GroupKDIGO 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD).Kidney Int Suppl (2011). 2017; 7: 1-59Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1166) Google Scholar Yet, a recommendation that treatments should be based on multiples of a ULN value is quite unique and is a circumvolution because of the lack of standardization of PTH assays.2Cavalier E. Vasikaran S. Bhattoa H.P. et al.The path to the standardization of PTH: is this a realistic possibility? A position paper of the IFCC C-BM.Clin Chim Acta. 2021; 515: 44-51Crossref PubMed Scopus (12) Google Scholar Such a lack of standardization is unfortunately a real source of confusion for clinicians in their daily practice, potentially leading to significant medical errors.3Sturgeon C.M. Sprague S. Almond A. et al.Perspective and priorities for improvement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement—a view from the IFCC Working Group for PTH.Clin Chim Acta. 2017; 467: 42-47Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar,4Souberbielle J.-C. Boutten A. Carlier M.-C. et al.Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: implication for the care of CKD patients.Kidney Int. 2006; 70: 345-350Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (251) Google Scholar Several reasons contributed so far to the current lack of standardization in PTH assays. The first one is the presence of circulating PTH fragments alongside the bioactive 1 to 84 PTH peptide.5Gardella T.J. Axelrod D. Rubin D. et al.Mutational analysis of the receptor-activating region of human parathyroid hormone.J Biol Chem. 1991; 266: 13141-13146Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar These fragments, which are N-terminal or C-terminal truncated forms of PTH, circulate in the blood owing to liver metabolism of the active peptide or direct secretion by the parathyroid glands.6Segre G.V. Perkins A.S. Witters L. Potts J.T. Metabolism of parathyroid hormone by isolated rat Kupffer cells and hepatocytes.J Clin Invest. 1981; 67: 449-457Crossref PubMed Scopus (75) Google Scholar, 7Hanley D.A. Ayer L.M. Calcium-dependent release of carboxyl-terminal fragments of parathyroid hormone by hyperplastic human parathyroid tissue in vitro.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986; 63: 1075-1079Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar, 8Mayer G.P. Keaton J.A. Hurst J.G. Habener J.F. Effects of plasma calcium concentration on the relative proportion of hormone and carboxyl fragments in parathyroid venous blood.Endocrinology. 1979; 104: 1778-1784Crossref PubMed Scopus (177) Google Scholar These fragments, which are eliminated by the kidney, have a longer half-life than 1 to 84 PTH itself,9Yamashita H. Gao P. Cantor T. et al.Large carboxy-terminal parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragment with a relatively longer half-life than 1-84 PTH is secreted directly from the parathyroid gland in humans.Eur J Endocrinol. 2003; 149: 301-306Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar,10Yamashita H. Cantor T. Uchino S. et al.Sequential changes in plasma intact and whole parathyroid hormone levels during parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism.World J Surg. 2005; 29: 169-173Crossref PubMed Scopus (25) Google Scholar accumulate in the blood of CKD patients,11D’amour P. Lazure C. Labelle F. Metabolism of radioiodinated carboxy-terminal fragments of bovine parathyroid hormone in normal and anephric rats.Endocrinology. 1985; 117: 127-134Crossref PubMed Scopus (30) Google Scholar, 12D’Amour P. Circulating PTH molecular forms: what we know and what we don’t.Kidney Int. 2006; 70: S29-S33Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (46) Google Scholar, 13Kritmetapak K. Losbanos L.A. Hines J.M. et al.Chemical characterization and quantification of circulating intact PTH and PTH fragments by high-resolution mass spectrometry in chronic renal failure.Clin Chem. 2021; 67: 843-853Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar and potentially interfere with second generation PTH assays (referred as “intact” PTH assay). Indeed, such assays are supposed to recognize, with various cross-reactivities, a family of large C-terminal fragments referred to as “non-(1 to 84)” PTH.14Lepage R. Roy L. Brossard J.H. et al.A non-(1-84) circulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragment interferes significantly with intact PTH commercial assay measurements in uremic samples.Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 805-809Crossref PubMed Scopus (335) Google Scholar This is not the case of third generation immunoassays (also referred as “whole” or “bioactive” PTH assays) because such assays incorporate an anti–N-terminal antibody directed toward the first 4 amino acids of the peptide, eliminating the issue of cross-reactivity with PTH fragments.15John M.R. Goodman W.G. Ping G. et al.A novel immunoradiometric assay detects full-length human PTH but not amino-terminally truncated fragments: implications for PTH measurements in renal failure.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999; 84: 4287-4290Crossref PubMed Google Scholar,16Gao P. Scheibel S. D’Amour P. et al.Development of a novel immunoradiometric assay exclusively for biologically active whole parathyroid hormone 1-84: implications for improvement of accurate assessment of parathyroid function.J Bone Miner Res. 2001; 16: 605-614Crossref PubMed Scopus (344) Google Scholar The second reason for the lack of standardization in PTH assays is calibration. Indeed, despite the availability of the World Health Organization International Standard PTH 1-84, human, recombinant (NIBSC [National Institute for Biological Standards and Control] code: 95/646) (WHO 95/646 PTH IS), differences in calibration remain, which can be due to noncommutability of the WHO material and/or its incorrect use by assay the of the of the WHO 95/646 PTH can from to on the assay C.M. Sprague S. Almond A. et al.Perspective and priorities for improvement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement—a view from the IFCC Working Group for PTH.Clin Chim Acta. 2017; 467: 42-47Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar the lack of a reference measurement a method providing true values which commercial assay be to the lack of standardization in PTH assays. In this we aimed at the impact of a recalibration of 5 PTH second and third PTH assays, on the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry reference method we recently This method is calibrated the WHO 95/646 PTH and the to a reference measurement C. P. et of an LC-MS/MS method using for the quantification of 1-84 parathyroid toward a reference measurement Chem. Scopus Google Scholar the second and third generation PTH assays from on the the second and third generation assays from on the and the third generation PTH assay from on the The of methods are in 1 for reference. As we the LC-MS/MS method that we recently C. P. et of an LC-MS/MS method using for the quantification of 1-84 parathyroid toward a reference measurement Chem. Scopus Google Scholar this method by eliminating the use of during the from cross-reactivity concerns. is calibrated the WHO 95/646 PTH providing a reference LC-MS/MS method for 1 to 84 PTH from to and a measurement of of second and third generation PTH immunoassays as by the values antibody and antibody and a of of the WHO 95/646 PTH PTH 95/646 PTH PTH of human recombinant of human whole 95/646 PTH of International PTH, parathyroid World Health in a of International PTH, parathyroid World Health a calibration panel of of plasma samples by at different samples from daily to a The samples were on the of their value determined method third generation and were to the measuring panel we plasma from CKD patients from and from and and from G3a and from and from panel we plasma from CKD patients from from and from G3a from and from The plasma samples for panel were at for than a and not were at which the a WHO International Standard 1-84, human, recombinant (NIBSC code: 95/646) was to the calibration for the LC-MS/MS method. The measurements of the and were conducted at of a of the use of different for samples were in using the 5 immunoassays and the LC-MS/MS method. the of the results of the calibration we for of the immunoassays to the immunoassays on the LC-MS/MS method, and we the robustness of this calibration on the To evaluate the clinical impact of we the of and CKD patients using the LC-MS/MS method and the different immunoassays on the of a ULN we the of patients and recalibration by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Work GroupKDIGO clinical for the and treatment of chronic kidney bone (CKD-MBD).Kidney Int. Scholar and to 9 times multiples of the ULN the of the calibration 1 was the measuring for the second generation assay and was The of the was to to to to to and 5 to for second second third third third and LC-MS/MS method, The of with LC-MS/MS and the are in and and of the calibration samples for the LC-MS/MS reference second second third third third liquid chromatography tandem mass in a liquid chromatography tandem mass These were to the PTH results of the samples of the The results obtained from the sets of samples and recalibration are in the PTH concentrations were and for second third second third third and LC-MS/MS method, in panel the values were and for the 5 the samples of panel the concentrations calibration were and for the the values for immunoassays were and of the and recalibration of the samples on the reference LC-MS/MS panel panel second third of liquid chromatography tandem mass in a second third of liquid chromatography tandem mass the the immunoassays the and third generation and second to LC-MS/MS from to in panel 1 and from to in panel the to and in panel 1 and from to in panel for The third generation LC-MS/MS recalibration to in panel 1 and from to in panel but to a to the assays. The from to in panel 1 and from to in panel To the clinical was to a ULN a ULN for the LC-MS/MS method not we to use the of the 5 ULN values for obtained the The ULN values were and for second second third third and third values were to and The of ULN values was to be which was as the ULN value to be as the reference value for the LC-MS/MS method and the 5 and the of the results obtained in and CKD and recalibration to the ULN value and 4 the results of patients to to 9 times the ULN value and using values of and and 9 as 1 patient was by the second generation assay in the as was with the LC-MS/MS and 5 were by the third generation assay as were 5 the for a a CKD and a patient and recalibration of the immunoassays using the LC-MS/MS method. the an LC-MS/MS concentration of This measurement to PTH concentrations from the third generation to determined by the second generation assay). However, the values were to a third generation and third generation assay). in the case of a CKD patient with LC-MS/MS PTH concentrations of and immunoassays PTH concentrations from using the third generation to using the second generation the recalibration to a from third generation to third generation an patient an LC-MS/MS PTH value of a PTH concentration of to the PTH concentrations from to of the results obtained in chronic kidney disease patients and The to which is the of the 5 upper limit of normal values for obtained the are second third liquid chromatography tandem mass of the results obtained in hemodialyzed patients and The to 9 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) values on the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method, determined by the of the ULN values obtained recalibration are second third the in parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations in in different a kidney disease a CKD patient and a hemodialyzed patient The measurements by and by the recalibration of immunoassays using the reference liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. The and the PTH concentrations in second third The of this suggests that is to all PTH assays, of the assay or third generation This the to significant in the of chronic kidney disease–mineral and bone disorder. In et the of the to Kidney Kidney Outcomes values as for PTH in J.-C. Boutten A. Carlier M.-C. et al.Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: implication for the care of CKD patients.Kidney Int. 2006; 70: 345-350Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (251) Google Kidney clinical for bone metabolism and disease in chronic kidney J Kidney 2003; Google Scholar The that despite the assays values from to the assays second generation and third generation assays) significantly This the to to significant clinical as patients be as or the Kidney Outcomes on the assay The implication was that treatment have for a patient on the of the of PTH To address this the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes using multiples of the ULN value by assay as PTH for this significantly reduced the in patients based on PTH E. P. L. et of PTH concentrations with different kits in patients to the importance of the reference PubMed Scopus Google Scholar However, a of this the of establishing PTH reference values J.-C. F. et the reference values for parathyroid hormone concentration are should Invest. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar is that such as and of the in the to PTH reference values have significant implications for the PTH ULN E. P. et and clinical of the assay for and immunoassays for in third hemodialyzed and care Google Scholar, G. G. et hormone reference ranges in by Endocrinol Invest. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J.A. J.M. A. of in the of reference for parathyroid Chim Acta. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar that the to address this be to true standardization of all PTH assays, that of assay all assays the or results for a This the of a ULN of the PTH assay such a ULN value analysis across of various all of primary and of secondary such as and measurement of the samples with the LC-MS/MS reference E. P. et and clinical of the assay for and immunoassays for in third hemodialyzed and care Google Scholar, G. G. et hormone reference ranges in by Endocrinol Invest. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J.A. J.M. A. of in the of reference for parathyroid Chim Acta. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar the for such a is paramount and the of to bone such as the International of Clinical and Kidney Disease: Improving Global or the International is that such a is and to be As a we a ULN value from the PTH assays and is crucial to that in using this was not to a ULN of in ULN values. the of using this method was to the of recalibrating the assays and their impact on the clinical interpretation of results, should a ULN value be across all assays. Indeed, results that a ULN value can be for all PTH assays and that PTH assays can be that is this for more than As are and reasons such differences in calibration despite the availability of the WHO 95/646 PTH These reasons can be the presence of PTH fragments that accumulate in the blood of CKD cross-reactivity with in PTH assays standardization in CKD the of the to is and the of a generation assay that the lack of reference an LC-MS/MS method, that and to accurate and the of a reference of true human that the calibration of all assays. In the have in the standardization of PTH assays, with the of methods by et K. Losbanos L.A. Hines J.M. et al.Chemical characterization and quantification of circulating intact PTH and PTH fragments by high-resolution mass spectrometry in chronic renal failure.Clin Chem. 2021; 67: 843-853Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar and et C. P. et of an LC-MS/MS method using for the quantification of 1-84 parathyroid toward a reference measurement Chem. Scopus Google Scholar These have crucial that oxidized 1 to 84 PTH, to be in the of patients to S. the parathyroid hormone what do assays J PubMed Scopus Google S. et parathyroid hormone (PTH) in patients with we a generation parathyroid hormone Scopus Google Scholar is the from have conducted using mass which demonstrated the of the to 84 PTH fragment in human et of carboxyl-terminal peptide fragments of parathyroid hormone in human plasma at levels by mass Chem. 2006; PubMed Scopus Google T. D.A. et to parathyroid hormone and Chem. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar This to cross-reactivity with second generation assays, to be in the blood samples of et demonstrated that the circulating PTH fragments in the blood of CKD patients did not interfere with the second generation the of et that a be to PTH results to H. hormone measurement in Int. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar the methods developed by et K. Losbanos L.A. Hines J.M. et al.Chemical characterization and quantification of circulating intact PTH and PTH fragments by high-resolution mass spectrometry in chronic renal failure.Clin Chem. 2021; 67: 843-853Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar and et C. P. et of an LC-MS/MS method using for the quantification of 1-84 parathyroid toward a reference measurement Chem. Scopus Google Scholar are calibrated the WHO 95/646 PTH and as reference methods for PTH in the which all immunoassays be However, is that the using a and not a improvement in 1 to 84 PTH The that differences assays are due to calibration and that standardizing calibration of PTH assays is By recalibrating 5 PTH immunoassays second generation and third generation assays) using a of plasma with concentrations using LC-MS/MS reference measurement we PTH results in different of and we demonstrated that the circulating PTH fragments did not this recalibration However, is to that in the case of such as parathyroid E. D. et al.The of parathyroid hormone as by and assays as a for parathyroid Clin Endocrinol Metab. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar be or PTH monitoring is during parathyroid E. J.-C. PTH results with but not with generation PTH Chim Acta. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar forms and in patients’ These unique forms be using second generation PTH assays but not with third generation assays, or this in is crucial to that of forms not have the mass spectrometry the of liquid chromatography et different from 1 to 84 PTH in certain patients with parathyroid not in all L. L. Brossard J.H. et of parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragments detected by J Endocrinol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar This was by et H. Gao P. Cantor T. et al.Large carboxy-terminal parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragment with a relatively longer half-life than 1-84 PTH is secreted directly from the parathyroid gland in humans.Eur J Endocrinol. 2003; 149: 301-306Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar in PTH the and the in patients with primary of such fragments or forms and their in In this we second generation PTH assays and third generation assays. Yet, assessment using second generation PTH Indeed, on with on in To this we the of second and third generation PTH assays on their and the second generation assay is that the assays in this a As a across a of second generation PTH immunoassays a to the robustness of this a significant toward PTH we to that the different methods yield consistent results to a of calibration reference the current WHO 95/646 PTH is to be with a and values determined with a reference measurement and all clinicians in bone and mineral metabolism to to their assays with the reference this second and third generation assays be a significant The the of assays the or not of the a of PTH in parathyroid and in forms of secondary in E. D. et al.The of parathyroid hormone as by and assays as a for parathyroid Clin Endocrinol Metab. PubMed Scopus Google H. et whole PTH as an of parathyroid five case and a Scholar to 5 PTH assays, the of the recalibration results as a of that recalibration of PTH assays is However, this that can be the In is are reasons to that the standardization in PTH measurement is ultimately the care of is a to and is a to is a to the The in this are on of PTH measurement by a for hormone measurement is in managing chronic kidney disease–mineral bone However, are immunoassays with variability. To address this, et developed standardization of parathyroid hormone measurement by establishing of assay the liquid chromatography to tandem mass spectrometry method. The recalibration successfully reduced for more consistent PDF

Topics & Concepts

Parathyroid hormoneStandardizationKidney diseaseMedicineExternal quality assessmentInternal medicineUrologyChemistryChromatographyPathologyComputer scienceCalciumOperating systemParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsMagnesium in Health and DiseaseVitamin D Research Studies
Unveiling a new era with liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to enhance parathyroid hormone measurement in patients with chronic kidney disease | Litcius