The Essential Role of PCR and PCR Panel Size in Comparison with Urine Culture in Identification of Polymicrobial and Fastidious Organisms in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Xingpei Hao, Marcus Cognetti, Chiraag Patel, Nathalie Jean-Charles, Arun Tumati, Rhonda Burch-Smith, Mara Holton, Deepak Kapoor
Abstract
Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are difficult to treat, consume substantial resources, and cause increased patient morbidity. Data suggest that cUTI may be caused by polymicrobial and fastidious organisms (PMOs and FOs, respectively); as such, urine culture (UC) may be an unreliable diagnostic tool for detecting cUTIs. We sought to determine the utility of PCR testing for patients presumed to have a cUTI and determine the impact of PCR panel size on organism detection. We reviewed 36,586 specimens from patients with presumptive cUTIs who received both UC and PCR testing. Overall positivity rate for PCR and UC was 52.3% and 33.9%, respectively (p < 0.01). PCR detected more PMO and FO than UC (PMO: 46.2% vs. 3.6%; FO: 31.3% vs. 0.7%, respectively, both p < 0.01). Line-item concordance showed that PCR detected 90.2% of organisms identified by UC whereas UC discovered 31.9% of organisms detected by PCR (p < 0.01). Organism detection increased with expansion in PCR panel size from 5–25 organisms (p < 0.01). Our data show that overall positivity rate and the detection of individual organisms, PMO and FO are significantly with PCR testing and that these advantages are ideally realized with a PCR panel size of 25 or greater.