Litcius/Paper detail

Antimicrobial resistance in patients with endodontic infections: A systematic scoping review of observational studies

Carlos M. Ardila, Jader‐Alexander Bedoya‐García, Daniel González‐Arroyave

2022Australian Endodontic Journal19 citationsDOI

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and proportions of antimicrobial-resistant species in patients with endodontic infections. A systematic scoping review of scientific evidence was accomplished involving different databases. Nine investigations were selected including 651 patients. Enterococcus faecalis was resistant to tetracycline (30%-70%), clindamycin (100%), erythromycin (10%-20%), ampicillin (9%) and azithromycin (60%). On the contrary, Prevotella spp., Fusobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. were resistant to penicillin, tetracycline, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin, erythromycin, metronidazole and clindamycin in different proportions. Fusobacterium nucleatum showed high resistance to amoxicillin, amoxicillin plus clavulanate and erythromycin. Prevotella oralis presented a predisposition to augment its resistance to clindamycin over time. Tanerella forsythia exhibited resistance to ciprofloxacin and rifampicin. Lactococcus lactis presented robust resistance to cephalosporins, metronidazole, penicillin, amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. It was observed high levels of resistance to antimicrobials that have been utilised in the local and systemic treatment of oral cavity infections.

Topics & Concepts

AmoxicillinClindamycinAntibiotic resistanceMicrobiologyMedicineFusobacterium nucleatumErythromycinPenicillinCiprofloxacinAntibioticsBiologyInternal medicinePeriodontitisPorphyromonas gingivalisEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsOral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Radiography and Imaging
Antimicrobial resistance in patients with endodontic infections: A systematic scoping review of observational studies | Litcius