Litcius/Paper detail

How Does LCL Height Influence Deep Convective Updraft Width?

Jake P. Mulholland, John M. Peters, Hugh Morrison

2021Geophysical Research Letters51 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Previous studies have hypothesized that the width of deep convection should positively scale with lifting condensation level (LCL) height. To evaluate this hypothesis, we analyzed idealized large‐eddy simulations with varying LCL heights and initial warm bubble widths in unsheared environments with comparable convective available potential energy. For a given initial warm bubble width, simulations with higher LCLs result in wider, deeper, and stronger cloudy updrafts compared to simulations with lower LCLs. Rising dry thermals in higher LCL simulations experience longer residence times within the sub‐cloud layer, and consequently entrain more conditionally unstable air and grow wider before reaching the LCL. The resulting cloudy updrafts are wider, deeper, and have faster vertical velocities because of a reduction in entrainment‐driven dilution of buoyancy, relative to lower LCL simulations. These results confirm the hypothesized positive relationship between LCL height and deep convective updraft width, and provide a physical explanation for this relationship.

Topics & Concepts

BuoyancyEntrainment (biomusicology)ConvectionMechanicsAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyLarge eddy simulationBubbleEnvironmental sciencePhysicsTurbulenceAcousticsRhythmMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsWind and Air Flow StudiesAtmospheric aerosols and clouds