Litcius/Paper detail

Modular comparison of untargeted metabolomics processing steps

Markus Aigensberger, Christoph Bueschl, Ezequias Castillo‐Lopez, Sara Ricci, Raul Rivera‐Chacon, Qendrim Zebeli, Franz Berthiller, Heidi Schwartz

2024Analytica Chimica Acta16 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics requires robust and reliable strategies for data processing to extract relevant information form the underlying raw data. Multiple platforms for data processing are available, but the choice of software tool can have an impact on the analysis. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of four workflows based on commonly used metabolomics software tools: XCMS, Compound Discoverer, MS-DIAL, and MZmine. These tools were applied to a dataset derived from bovine saliva samples spiked with small polar molecules analyzed by anion exchange chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry. The analysis revealed significant differences in the number and overlap of detected features, with only approximately 8 % of the features included in all four peak tables. Among the overlapping features, MS-DIAL demonstrated the greatest similarity to manual integration, while XCMS and MZmine also performed well. In contrast, Compound Discoverer had issues to reliably integrate high baseline peaks. This study also explores various post-processing strategies, including missing value imputation, transformation, scaling, and filtering. The assessment of missing values indicated that they primarily originated from low abundance, making imputation with small values the most effective approach. No clear evidence suggested that transformation is necessary for downstream statistical analyses. Auto scaling emerged as the most suitable strategy for data scaling. Low thresholds for blank filtering were found to be the most effective in enhancing data quality. The optimization of filtering thresholds required a careful balance to remove unnecessary information while retaining vital data. This work provides an overview of commonly applied strategies in untargeted metabolomics analysis, emphasizing the importance of careful workflow selection and optimization. It serves as a resource for refining data processing strategies to achieve accurate and reliable results, while also offering fresh insights into the challenges encountered throughout the untargeted metabolomics processing pipeline. Created in BioRender. Aigensberger, M. (2024) https://BioRender.com/e63g016 . • A simple dataset generated from bovine saliva spiked with 42 compounds, analyzed by anion exchange chromatography and HR-MS. • Comparison of four optimized processing workflows based on XCMS, Compound Discoverer, MS-DIAL, and MZmine. • Manual classification of all detected features into true positive and false positive signals. • Comprehensive comparison of automatic and manual integration. • In-depth assessment of missing value imputation, transformation, scaling, and filtering.

Topics & Concepts

ChemistryMetabolomicsModular designBiochemical engineeringChromatographyProgramming languageComputer scienceEngineeringMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsCell Image Analysis Techniques
Modular comparison of untargeted metabolomics processing steps | Litcius