Considering De-Extinction: Zombie Arguments and the Walking (And Flying and Swimming) Dead
Eric Katz
Abstract
De-extinction raises anew ontological and epistemological problems that have engaged environmental philosophers for decades. This essay re-examines these issues to provide a fuller understanding—and a critique—of de-extinction. One of my claims is that de-extinction as a philosophical problem merely recycles old issues and debates in the field (hence, “zombie” arguments). De-extinction is a project that arises out of the assertion of human domination of the natural world. Thus the acceptance of de-extinction as an environmental policy is an expression of a human-nature relationship that disvalues the natural world and subjugates nature completely to the interests of humanity.
Topics & Concepts
AssertionZombieHumanityExtinction (optical mineralogy)Natural (archaeology)Environmental ethicsEpistemologySociologyPhilosophyHistoryLawPolitical sciencePhysicsComputer scienceArchaeologyOpticsProgramming languageComputer securityEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsGeographies of human-animal interactionsReligion, Ecology, and Ethics