Litcius/Paper detail

Sampling frequency thresholds for the quantum advantage of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Danylo Lykov, Jonathan Wurtz, C. Poole, M. Saffman, Thomas Noël, Yuri Alexeev

2023npj Quantum Information33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract We compare the performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with state-of-the-art classical solvers Gurobi and MQLib to solve the MaxCut problem on 3-regular graphs. We identify the minimum noiseless sampling frequency and depth p required for a quantum device to outperform classical algorithms. There is potential for quantum advantage on hundreds of qubits and moderate depth with a sampling frequency of 10 kHz. We observe, however, that classical heuristic solvers are capable of producing high-quality approximate solutions in linear time complexity. In order to match this quality for large graph sizes N , a quantum device must support depth p > 11. Additionally, multi-shot QAOA is not efficient on large graphs, indicating that QAOA p ≤ 11 does not scale with N . These results limit achieving quantum advantage for QAOA MaxCut on 3-regular graphs. Other problems, such as different graphs, weighted MaxCut, and 3-SAT, may be better suited for achieving quantum advantage on near-term quantum devices.

Topics & Concepts

QuantumMathematicsQubitQuantum algorithmAlgorithmQuantum computerHeuristicSampling (signal processing)Limit (mathematics)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationQuantum mechanicsDetectorMathematical analysisTelecommunicationsPhysicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum and electron transport phenomena