Litcius/Paper detail

De novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer – A systematic review of population-level changes in survival since 1995

Sarah J. Lord, K Bahlmann, DL O'Connell, BE Kiely, Benjamin Daniels, Sallie‐Anne Pearson, Jane Beith, M Bulsara, Nehmat Houssami

2022EClinicalMedicine41 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: metastatic BC (dnMBC) and recurrent MBC (rMBC). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE 01/01/1995-12/04/2021 to identify population-based cohort studies of MBC reporting overall (OS) or BC-specific survival (BCSS) over time. We appraised risk-of-bias and summarised survival descriptively for MBC diagnoses in 5-year periods from 1995 until 2014; and for age, hormone receptor and HER2 subgroups. FINDINGS: = 0.045), 3 studies). For rMBC, one study reported no change in survival between 1998 and 2006 and 2007-2013 (median OS 23 months). For combined MBC, 76-89% had rMBC. Three of four studies observed no change in median OS after 2000. Of these, one study reported median OS improved for women ≤60 years (1995-1999 19·1; 2000-2004 22·3 months) but not >60 years (12·7, 11·6 months). INTERPRETATION: Population-level improvements in OS for dnMBC have not been consistently observed in rMBC cohorts nor older women. These findings have implications for counselling patients about prognosis, planning cancer services and trial stratification. FUNDING: SL was funded in part by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Project Grant ID: 1125433. NH was funded by the NBCF Chair in Breast Cancer Prevention grant (EC-21-001) and a NHMRC Investigator (Leader) grant (194410). BD and SAP were funded in part by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Medicines Intelligence (1196900).

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMetastatic breast cancerBreast cancerInternal medicinePopulationRelative survivalConfoundingCohort studyOncologyCancerCohortGynecologyCancer registryEnvironmental healthAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Treatment and Pharmacology