Autonomy and paternalism in shared decision‐making in a Saudi Arabian tertiary hospital: A cross‐sectional study
Yousef Y. Alabdullah, Esra Alzaid, Safa S. Alsaad, Turki Hassan Alamri, Saleh W. Alolayan, Suliman Bah, Abdullah Srour Aljoudi
Abstract
Medical paternalism has long been a common medical practice. However, patient autonomy in healthcare has been recently adopted by doctors and patients alike. This study explored whether doctors and patients in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia preferred autonomy or paternalism in shared decision-making. A total of 118 participants (51 patients requiring total knee replacement, owing to stages 3-4 of osteoarthritis, and 67 doctors) from the Eastern province, Saudi Arabia. responded to a 17-question category-based questionnaire involving four scales of autonomy. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test results revealed that in this hospital, patients preferred a paternalistic approach toward their medical care along with a full disclosure of the risks related to surgical procedures. We recommend health education regarding the specific autonomy subscales (doctor knows best, patient should decide, right to non-participation, and obligatory risk information), and the implementation of protocols that protect patients' rights and enhance personal autonomy.