Methods for Measuring and Valuing Informal Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Stroke
Neha Das, Phuong Nguyen, Thi Quynh Anh Ho, Peter Lee, Suzanne Robinson, Lan Gao
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To accurately capture informal care in healthcare evaluations, rigorous approaches are required to measure and value this important care component. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we intended to summarize the current methods of measuring and valuing informal care costs in healthcare evaluations (full and partial healthcare evaluations, including cost of illness and cost analysis) in stroke. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit, and CINAHL. We used EndNote 20, Research Screener, and Covidence platforms for screening and data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed on informal care hours, and a subgroup meta-analysis was conducted based on stroke severity. RESULTS: = 99.97%). The overall risk of bias in the studies was assessed as low. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing the measurement and valuation of informal care costs is essential for improving the consistency and comparability of economic evaluations. Pilot studies that incorporate standardized informal care cost valuation methods can help identify any practical challenges and capture the impact of informal care more accurately.