Litcius/Paper detail

Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers

Justine Lacey, Rebecca Coates, Matthew J. Herington

2020Journal of Responsible Innovation35 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recent arguments for responsible innovation to progress beyond the narrow focus on open access and toward open science present the opportunity for a deliberate global transition to a culture of transparent and open scientific conduct that will deliver greater societal benefit. This paper presents results from a survey of 171 Australian scientists, researchers and other professionals on their expectations and perspectives of transparency and openness in current scientific research practice. The results suggest that for this cultural transition to occur, the responsibility for strengthening transparency and openness must be undertaken not only by scientists and researchers, but also research funding and delivery agencies, and even those beyond the research and innovation sector. These findings are a first step towards defining and understanding what open science means in an Australian context, and what shifts are needed from researchers, research institutions and policy makers to move toward open science for responsible innovation.

Topics & Concepts

Openness to experienceTransparency (behavior)Responsible Research and InnovationOpen scienceOpen innovationContext (archaeology)Public relationsPolitical scienceScience policyOpen dataEngineering ethicsBusinessSociologyMarketingPublic administrationPsychologyEngineeringLawPaleontologyPhysicsAstronomyBiologySocial psychologyResearch Data Management Practicesscientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Open science for responsible innovation in Australia: understanding the expectations and priorities of scientists and researchers | Litcius