Current methods for developing predictive energy equations in maintenance dialysis are imprecise
Alainn Bailey, Rebecca Brody, Joachim Sackey, J. Scott Parrott, Emily Peters, Laura Byham‐Gray
Abstract
PURPOSE: similar methods in different demographic samples; the Maintenance Haemodialysis Equation (MHDE REE), Vilar et al. Equation (Vilar REE) and the Fernandes et al. Equation (Cuppari REE). We compared them in a US cohort and assessed precision relative to measured REE (mREE) from indirect calorimetry. Because of expected imprecision at the extremes of the weight distribution, we also assessed the PEEs stratified by body mass index (BMI) subgroups. METHODS: This analysis comprised of 113 individuals from the Rutgers Nutrition and Kidney Database. Estimated REE (eREE) was calculated for each PEE, and agreement with mREE was set at > 50% of values within the limits of ±10%. Reliability and accuracy were determined using intraclass correlation (ICC) and a Bland Altman plot, which analysed the percentage difference of eREE form mREE. RESULTS: < .001 for all). The equations performed poorly at the lowest and highest BMI categories. CONCLUSION: Dialysis-specific energy equations showed variable accuracy. When categorized by BMI, the equations performed poorly at the extremes, where individuals are most vulnerable. Innovation is needed to understand these variances and correct the imprecision in PEEs for clinical practice.KEY MESSAGESPotentially impacting over millions of patients worldwide, our long-term goal is to understand energy expenditure (EE) across the spectrum of CKD (stages 1-5) in adults and children being treated with dialysis or transplantation, with the intent of providing tools for the health professional that will improve the delivery of quality care.Our research has identified and focussed on disease-specific factors which account for 60% of the variance in predicting EE in patients on MHD, but significant gaps remain.Thus, our central hypotheses are that (1) there are unique disease-specific determinants of EE and (2) prediction of EE for individuals diagnosed with CKD can be vastly improved with a model that combines these factors with more sophisticated approaches.