Panmixia in the American eel extends to its tropical range of distribution: Biological implications and policymaking challenges
Gabriela Ulmo‐Diaz, Augustin C. Engman, William O. McLarney, Carlos A. Lasso Alcalá, Dean A. Hendrickson, Étienne Bezault, Éric Feunteun, Fernando L. Prats‐Léon, Jean Wiener, Robert J. Maxwell, Ryan S. Mohammed, Thomas J. Kwak, José Benchetrit, Bérénice Bougas, Charles Babin, Éric Normandeau, Haig Djambazian, Shu‐Huang Chen, Sarah J. Reiling, Jiannis Ragoussis, Louis Bernatchez
Abstract
) has long been regarded as a panmictic fish and has been confirmed as such in the northern part of its range. In this paper, we tested for the first time whether panmixia extends to the tropical range of the species. To do so, we first assembled a reference genome (975 Mbp, 19 chromosomes) combining long (PacBio and Nanopore and short (Illumina paired-end) reads technologies to support both this study and future research. To test for population structure, we estimated genotype likelihoods from low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of 460 American eels, collected at 21 sampling sites (in seven geographic regions) ranging from Canada to Trinidad and Tobago. We estimated genetic distance between regions, performed ADMIXTURE-like clustering analysis and multivariate analysis, and found no evidence of population structure, thus confirming that panmixia extends to the tropical range of the species. In addition, two genomic regions with putative inversions were observed, both geographically widespread and present at similar frequencies in all regions. We discuss the implications of lack of genetic population structure for the species. Our results are key for the future genomic research in the American eel and the implementation of conservation measures throughout its geographic range. Additionally, our results can be applied to fisheries management and aquaculture of the species.