Immune checkpoint inhibitors alone vs immune checkpoint inhibitors—combined chemotherapy for NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression: a network meta-analysis
Yimin Wang, Hedong Han, Fang Zhang, Tangfeng Lv, Ping Zhan, Mingxiang Ye, Yong Song, Hongbing Liu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We indirectly compared the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors alone (ICI) and ICI-combined chemotherapy (chemo-ICI) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (defined as tumour proportion score ≥50% or TC3/IC3) through network meta-analyses. METHODS: Through literature searches, we shortlisted 22 randomised controlled trials encompassing 4289 patients, with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) set as the primary outcomes. The dichotomous data for ORR and hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS and PFS were extracted. RESULTS: We found that chemo-ICI had significantly improved ORR (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5) and PFS (HR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48-0.74) relative to ICI. Although no significant difference in OS was observed, the analyses revealed that the chemo-ICI patients tended to undergo fewer progression events than ICI patients (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.6-1.1). In subgroup analysis, the non-squamous, PD-1 inhibitor and first-line treatment cohorts exhibited significant differences in ORR and PFS, but not in OS. However, in the squamous, PD-L1 inhibitor, and previously treated cohorts, PFS, OS and ORR were not different between chemo-ICI and ICI patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, for non-squamous NSCLC patients, accepting PD-1 as the first-line treatment may be a relatively better option.