Litcius/Paper detail

Grassland ecological compensation policy in China improves grassland quality and increases herders’ income

Lingling Hou, Fang Xia, Qihui Chen, Jikun Huang, Yong He, Rose Nathan, Scott Rozelle

2021Nature Communications301 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Many countries have undertaken large and high-profile payment-for-ecosystem-services (PES) programs to sustain the use of their natural resources. Nevertheless, few studies have comprehensively examined the impacts of existing PES programs. Grassland Ecological Compensation Policy (GECP) is one of the few pastorally focused PES programs with large investments and long duration, which aim to improve grassland quality and increase herder income. Here we present empirical evidence of the effects of GECP on grassland quality and herder income. Through a thorough and in-depth econometric analysis of remote sensing and household survey data, we find that, although GECP improves grassland quality (albeit to only a small extent) and has a large positive effect on income, it exacerbates existing income inequality among herders within their local communities. The analysis demonstrates that the program has induced herders to change their livestock production behavior. Heterogeneity analysis emphasizes the importance of making sure the programs are flexible and are adapted to local resource circumstances.

Topics & Concepts

GrasslandChinaQuality (philosophy)EcologyCompensation (psychology)AgroforestryGeographyNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceBiologyEconomicsPsychologyPhysicsQuantum mechanicsArchaeologyPsychoanalysisRangeland Management and Livestock EcologyConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Rights and Reforms
Grassland ecological compensation policy in China improves grassland quality and increases herders’ income | Litcius