Inference with finite time series: II. The window strikes back
C. Talbot, S. Biscoveanu, Aaron Zimmerman, Tomasz Baka, Will M. Farr, Jacob Golomb, C. G. Hoy, A. P. Lundgren, Jacopo Tissino, J. Veitch, A. Vijaykumar, M. J. Williams
Abstract
Abstract Smooth window functions are often applied to strain data when inferring the parameters describing the astrophysical sources of gravitational-wave transients. Within the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaboration, it is conventional to include a term to account for power loss due to this window in the likelihood function. We show that the inclusion of this factor leads to biased inference. The simplest solution to this, omitting the factor, leads to unbiased posteriors and Bayes factor estimates provided the window does not suppress the signal for signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , but unreliable estimates of the absolute likelihood. Instead, we propose a multi-stage method that yields consistent estimates for the absolute likelihood in addition to unbiased posterior distributions and Bayes factors for SNRs <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mi>O</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1000</mml:mn> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . Additionally, we demonstrate that the commonly held wisdom that using rectangular windows necessarily leads to biased inference is incorrect.