Litcius/Paper detail

Subitizing, unlike estimation, does not process sets in parallel

Wei Liu, Peng Zheng, Shaofang Huang, Guido Marco Cicchini

2020Scientific Reports25 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Enumeration of very small quantities is a common task that we perform everyday. Much research has highlighted that in these conditions humans display fast, near errorless performance, a phenomenon dubbed subitizing. It has been suggested that this regime has a pivotal role in numerosity perception. Here we asked if this system can process multiple sets of items in parallel. At odds with what happens for moderate numerosities, we found a strong impairment caused already by the introduction of a second group of items marked by a different color. Adding shape as a cue provided no benefit. The only case in which subitizing was possible was when the target and distractor group were held constant through the experimental block. These results show the surprising fact that whilst being rapid and errorless, subitizing does not have the capability to disentangle multiple groups of items and deals only with coarse stimulus statistics.

Topics & Concepts

Numerosity adaptation effectPerceptionEnumerationComputer scienceCognitive psychologyBlock (permutation group theory)Task (project management)PhenomenonProcess (computing)Artificial intelligencePsychologyMathematicsCombinatoricsQuantum mechanicsManagementPhysicsEconomicsNeuroscienceOperating systemCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and Pedagogy